# kaal:claim:5541658-036

**Claim.** AI's limitations in replicating human empathy together with the persistent risk of bias make a hybrid approach necessary, in which AI efficiency complements rather than substitutes for human discretion.

**Type.** condition  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- integration of AI into legal systems generally

**Source quote.**

> However, AI's limitations in replicating human empathy and the persistent risk of bias necessitate a hybrid approach, where AI's efficiency complements human discretion.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Morgan A. Gray, *The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law* (2025), XII. Conclusion, page 37

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Morgan A. Gray, The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5541658

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `e543a2d698fcd522d4d02e034cc9ee1344d0015d2c824b40b9e05ab7c0728c60` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Gray%20-%202025%20-%20The%20Evolving%20Role%20of%20Artificial%20Intelligence%20in%20Law.pdf

**Topics.** institutional-design

**Keywords.** hybrid-approach, human-oversight, bias, empathy

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.