# kaal:claim:5554218-017

**Claim.** Decentralized dispute resolution relies on decentralized networks of jurors, which raises unresolved concerns about juror competence and bias.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- complex disputes over tokenized real world assets

**Source quote.**

> DDR's reliance on decentralized networks raises concerns about juror competence and bias, as noted by Salger.

**From.** Furrer Andreas, Wulf A. Kaal, *Universal Digital Law Codex (UDLC) Building the Legal Infrastructure for the Digital Era* (2025), 2.6.4 Challenges and Future Directions, page 16

**Cite as.** Furrer Andreas, Wulf A. Kaal, Universal Digital Law Codex (UDLC) Building the Legal Infrastructure for the Digital Era (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5554218

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `55738b4035a91b70aa2ddaa127552fe4b373ec641afee2719fbdcabebdcbea44` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Andreas%20and%20Kaal%20-%202025%20-%20Universal%20Digital%20Law%20Codex%20%28UDLC%29%20Building%20the%20Legal%20Infrastructure%20for%20the%20Digital%20Era.pdf

**Failure mode.** Juror competence and bias in decentralized adjudication  (family: enforcement-gap)

**Topics.** systemic-risk, law-and-legal-systems, decentralization

**Keywords.** ddr, juror-competence, bias, dispute-resolution, decentralization

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.