# kaal:claim:5554218-028

**Claim.** Unilateral regulation of artificial intelligence by a single jurisdiction produces global ripple effects, but that approach reaches its limits because AI systems remain accessible worldwide over the internet.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- AI models distributed globally over the internet
- regulation by a single jurisdiction

**Source quote.**

> clear that unilateral regulation by one jurisdiction can have global ripple effects. However, this approach faces limitations when AI systems are accessible globally via the internet.

**From.** Furrer Andreas, Wulf A. Kaal, *Universal Digital Law Codex (UDLC) Building the Legal Infrastructure for the Digital Era* (2025), 4.3.5 Comparative Perspectives, page 29

**Cite as.** Furrer Andreas, Wulf A. Kaal, Universal Digital Law Codex (UDLC) Building the Legal Infrastructure for the Digital Era (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5554218

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `55738b4035a91b70aa2ddaa127552fe4b373ec641afee2719fbdcabebdcbea44` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Andreas%20and%20Kaal%20-%202025%20-%20Universal%20Digital%20Law%20Codex%20%28UDLC%29%20Building%20the%20Legal%20Infrastructure%20for%20the%20Digital%20Era.pdf

**Failure mode.** Limits of unilateral AI regulation  (family: jurisdictional-conflict)

**Topics.** ai-and-agents, governance-design

**Keywords.** ai-regulation, extraterritoriality, unilateralism, internet, global-governance

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.