# kaal:claim:5886442-014

**Claim.** Contesting the continuity view, the author argues that AI2AI is not a case of technological progress shifting the production possibility frontier outward as steam, electricity and the internet did, because those earlier shifts expanded the feasible set while preserving scarcity as the defining condition.

**Type.** mechanism  **Support.** argued

**Source quote.**

> This is not simply a case of technological progress shifting the production-possibility frontier outward, as occurred with steam, electricity, or the internet. Those earlier shifts expanded the feasible set while preserving scarcity as the defining condition.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *The AI-to-AI Economy and the Collapse of Anthropocentric Economic Theory* (2025), Neoclassical Economics and the Scarcity Postulate, page 12

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, The AI-to-AI Economy and the Collapse of Anthropocentric Economic Theory (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5886442

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `d2f6edebc562152f6ea706cc3ad944f7a1b81979931571e54cb782849839dfce` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202025%20-%20The%20AI-to-AI%20Economy%20and%20the%20Collapse%20of%20Anthropocentric%20Economic%20Theory.pdf

**Topics.** economics

**Keywords.** production-possibility-frontier, technological-change, scarcity, phase-transition

**Related claims.**

- extended_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/6421319-007

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.