# kaal:claim:5887242-023

**Claim.** In the worked numerical example, a single incorrect high-conviction bet costs the dissenting expert seventy five percent of his governance influence, demonstrating the severity of tight coupling.

**Type.** empirical  **Support.** evidenced

**Holds when.**

- the stipulated five-expert numerical scenario in the article

**Source quote.**

> David loses 75% of his influence in a single incorrect high-conviction bet

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *The UDLC DAO Operationalizing a Continuously Evolving Universal Digital Law Codex Through Weighted* (2025), Chapter III.B.7, page 14

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, The UDLC DAO Operationalizing a Continuously Evolving Universal Digital Law Codex Through Weighted (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5887242

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `4e5c2e2b4304af6d22e0b0939b1fddeabcf091e19a1b00b7bfccf77cbd6280c5` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202025%20-%20The%20UDLC%20DAO%20Operationalizing%20a%20Continuously%20Evolving%20Universal%20Digital%20Law%20Codex%20Through%20Weighted.pdf

**Topics.** institutional-design

**Keywords.** numerical-example, tight-coupling, influence-loss, slashing

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.