# kaal:claim:617681-005

**Claim.** The authors propose that private ordering can design an adjudication system for European corporate law better than public ordering by Member States that are marketing their corporate laws to managers and investors abroad.

**Type.** design  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- Member States exporting corporate law beyond their borders

**Source quote.**

> We rather propose that private ordering can better design an adjudication system than can public ordering by Member States marketing their corporate laws to managers and investors outside their borders.

**From.** Christian Kirchner, Richard W. Painter, Wulf A. Kaal, *Regulatory Competition in EU Corporate Law after Inspire Art Unbundling Delaware's Product for Euro* (2004), A. Introduction, page 10

**Cite as.** Christian Kirchner, Richard W. Painter, Wulf A. Kaal, Regulatory Competition in EU Corporate Law after Inspire Art Unbundling Delaware's Product for Euro (2004). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=617681

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `e142130507ea2f5b025fd97b3f762d44ee3a7aaa82b155aab63434b85e8fd834` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kirchner%20et%20al.%20-%202004%20-%20Regulatory%20Competition%20in%20EU%20Corporate%20Law%20after%20Inspire%20Art%20Unbundling%20Delaware%27s%20Product%20for%20Euro.pdf

**Topics.** risk-and-incentives, law-and-legal-systems

**Keywords.** private-ordering, arbitration, adjudication, corporate-law

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.