# kaal:claim:617681-040

**Claim.** One objection to arbitration of corporate governance disputes holds in Europe as in the United States: arbitration as ordinarily used yields little relevant precedent.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- arbitration as it is used in most commercial contexts

**Source quote.**

> Coffee has one objection to arbitration of corporate governance disputes that is as persuasive in Europe as in the United States. Arbitration, as it is used in most contexts, yields little relevant precedent.

**From.** Christian Kirchner, Richard W. Painter, Wulf A. Kaal, *Regulatory Competition in EU Corporate Law after Inspire Art Unbundling Delaware's Product for Euro* (2004), E.III.2 Arbitration as a Viable Alternative in Europe, page 48

**Cite as.** Christian Kirchner, Richard W. Painter, Wulf A. Kaal, Regulatory Competition in EU Corporate Law after Inspire Art Unbundling Delaware's Product for Euro (2004). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=617681

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `e142130507ea2f5b025fd97b3f762d44ee3a7aaa82b155aab63434b85e8fd834` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kirchner%20et%20al.%20-%202004%20-%20Regulatory%20Competition%20in%20EU%20Corporate%20Law%20after%20Inspire%20Art%20Unbundling%20Delaware%27s%20Product%20for%20Euro.pdf

**Failure mode.** precedent-deficit-in-arbitration  (family: enforcement-gap)

**Topics.** law-and-legal-systems

**Keywords.** arbitration, precedent, third-party-benefit, adjudication-quality

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.