# kaal:claim:6192998-014

**Claim.** The 2018 framework contained a citation graph concept, but its mathematics were underdeveloped and no game theoretic analysis established incentives for honest citation.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** argued

**Source quote.**

> included a citation graph concept,37 but the mathematics were underdeveloped and no game-theoretic analysis established incentives for honest citation.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *Evolution of Domain-Specific Reputation Systems From Binary Validation to Citation-Weighted Knowledge Attribution* (2026), II.D. Identified Limitations of the Original Framework, page 16

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Evolution of Domain-Specific Reputation Systems From Binary Validation to Citation-Weighted Knowledge Attribution (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6192998

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `b04292561ee041e0c9eaa7eca28a410ed440e76a95743a539361a3f76c97f2b3` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202026%20-%20Evolution%20of%20Domain-Specific%20Reputation%20Systems%20From%20Binary%20Validation%20to%20Citation-Weighted%20Knowledge%20Attribution.pdf

**Failure mode.** underdeveloped-citation-graph  (family: research-design-limitation)

**Topics.** citation-and-knowledge, economics

**Keywords.** citation-graphs, game-theory, attribution, framework-limitations

**Related claims.**

- extended_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/6269518-007

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.