# kaal:claim:6269518-029

**Claim.** The limit to revaluation for citation-related references should be set at a moderate level so that under-cited posts can be meaningfully corrected without enabling destabilizing cascades.

**Type.** design  **Support.** asserted

**Source quote.**

> The limit to revaluation q2 for citation-related references should be moderate, allowing meaningful correction of under-cited posts without enabling destabilizing cascades.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *Citation Honesty Mechanisms in Weighted Directed Acyclic Graph Governance* (2026), V.C. Validation Pool Parameters for Citation Assessment, page 14

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Citation Honesty Mechanisms in Weighted Directed Acyclic Graph Governance (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6269518

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `f096ecf5b41bb9ae8642facd54b9149c7b594de53a1cc32718a4d806b772f88f` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202026%20-%20Citation%20Honesty%20Mechanisms%20in%20Weighted%20Directed%20Acyclic%20Graph%20Governance.pdf

**Topics.** economics, risk-and-incentives

**Keywords.** revaluation-limit, cascade-risk, validation-pools, parameter-calibration

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.