# kaal:claim:6607458-031

**Claim.** Static regulatory frameworks calibrated to legislative timescales cannot govern technologies evolving on exponential timescales, so dynamic regulation that self-adjusts through built-in feedback mechanisms is a precondition for effective governance of the computative domain.

**Type.** condition  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- applies to technologies that change on exponential timescales

**Source quote.**

> Dynamic regulation, institutional architecture that self-adjusts in response to technological change through built-in feedback mechanisms, is a precondition for effective governance of the computative domain.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *Computative Economics A Framework for Economic Analysis under Computational Abundance* (2026), IX.A. Dynamic Regulation, page 25

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Computative Economics A Framework for Economic Analysis under Computational Abundance (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6607458

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `75cca35350378eb8904866d068b5d2f3e1504629e6031457ce6c12152a88e3e8` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202026%20-%20Computative%20Economics%20A%20Framework%20for%20Economic%20Analysis%20under%20Computational%20Abundance.pdf

**Failure mode.** Pacing Problem  (family: regulatory-lag)

**Topics.** dynamic-regulation, governance-design

**Keywords.** dynamic-regulation, pacing-problem, regulatory-lag, governance

**Related claims.**

- restates: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/6192998-003

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.