# kaal:claim:6607458-032

**Claim.** The delegated-acts and code-of-practice mechanisms in recent artificial-intelligence statutes are only partial steps toward dynamic regulation because they remain tethered to legislative revision cycles running far slower than the technology they govern.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- applies to recent artificial-intelligence statutes

**Source quote.**

> The delegated-acts and code-of-practice mechanisms adopted under recent artificial-intelligence statutes represent partial steps in this direction but remain tethered to legislative revision cycles that operate at substantially lower frequency than the technology they govern.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *Computative Economics A Framework for Economic Analysis under Computational Abundance* (2026), IX.A. Dynamic Regulation, page 25

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Computative Economics A Framework for Economic Analysis under Computational Abundance (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6607458

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `75cca35350378eb8904866d068b5d2f3e1504629e6031457ce6c12152a88e3e8` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202026%20-%20Computative%20Economics%20A%20Framework%20for%20Economic%20Analysis%20under%20Computational%20Abundance.pdf

**Failure mode.** Tethered Revision Cycles  (family: rule-obsolescence-and-ossification)

**Topics.** ai-and-agents, governance-design, dynamic-regulation

**Keywords.** ai-regulation, delegated-acts, legislative-cycles, dynamic-regulation

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.