# kaal:claim:6655138-004

**Claim.** In Neoclassical analysis the action space is a parameter of the model and the agent is a chooser within it, whereas in Computative Economics the action space is an output of the agent and the agent is a generator over it; every operational difference between the two architectures follows from this parameter versus output distinction.

**Type.** definitional  **Support.** argued

**Source quote.**

> in Neoclassical analysis, the action space is a parameter of the model and the agent is a chooser within it. In Computative Economics analysis, the action space is an output of the agent and the agent is a generator over it.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *Possibility Loops An Operational Architecture for Computative Economics in Agent Coordination Systems* (2026), II.B The generated possibility space, contrasted with the Neoclassical commodity space, page 8

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Possibility Loops An Operational Architecture for Computative Economics in Agent Coordination Systems (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6655138

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `52cb210167f06f0c7a2581214b156326216543de80b8394320b629c045c9e214` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202026%20-%20Possibility%20Loops%20An%20Operational%20Architecture%20for%20Computative%20Economics%20in%20Agent%20Coordination%20Systems.pdf

**Topics.** ai-and-agents

**Keywords.** possibility-space, neoclassical-commodity-space, generative-agents, action-space

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.