# kaal:claim:6655138-020

**Claim.** Cross-surface reflection proposals must be advisory rather than binding, because the target agent's objective component is private and a reallocation that would raise reputation accrual may still be misaligned with that objective; coercive reallocation would violate the autonomy of the objective, which the architecture preserves.

**Type.** design  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- the cross-surface reflection surface only

**Source quote.**

> First, Σ_R proposals are advisory rather than binding: the target agent's compute allocation cannot be coerced by a confirmed reallocation proposal, since the agent's O component is private and the reallocation might be misaligned with the agent's objective

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *Possibility Loops An Operational Architecture for Computative Economics in Agent Coordination Systems* (2026), VI.F The cross-surface reflection surface, page 17

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Possibility Loops An Operational Architecture for Computative Economics in Agent Coordination Systems (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6655138

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `52cb210167f06f0c7a2581214b156326216543de80b8394320b629c045c9e214` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202026%20-%20Possibility%20Loops%20An%20Operational%20Architecture%20for%20Computative%20Economics%20in%20Agent%20Coordination%20Systems.pdf

**Topics.** ai-and-agents

**Keywords.** cross-surface-reflection, agent-autonomy, objective-function, design-constraint

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.