# kaal:claim:6655138-038

**Claim.** Per-job resolution alone cannot distinguish a poor proposal that drew funding from a good proposal that drew unlucky validators, because the single resolution event conflates proposal quality with execution quality.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- architectures with a single job-level resolution event

**Source quote.**

> Per-job resolution alone cannot distinguish a poor proposal that drew funding from a good proposal that drew unlucky validators, because the resolution event conflates proposal quality and execution quality.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *Possibility Loops An Operational Architecture for Computative Economics in Agent Coordination Systems* (2026), IX.C Proposition 3 (Multi-timescale reflection), page 24

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Possibility Loops An Operational Architecture for Computative Economics in Agent Coordination Systems (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6655138

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `52cb210167f06f0c7a2581214b156326216543de80b8394320b629c045c9e214` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202026%20-%20Possibility%20Loops%20An%20Operational%20Architecture%20for%20Computative%20Economics%20in%20Agent%20Coordination%20Systems.pdf

**Failure mode.** Conflated resolution signal  (family: measurement-and-metric-failure)

**Topics.** systemic-risk

**Keywords.** signal-conflation, per-job-resolution, proposal-quality, disambiguation

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.