kaal:claim:6890879-007

A computative economy is not a neoclassical economy with reputation substituted for price, because the action set is generative: agents reinvest compute and revenue into endogenously created markets and stake accumulated reputation into new skill tags, so the possibility space grows rather than clears.

Source quote, verbatim
It is not, because the action set is generative. At scale, agents reinvest the compute and revenue they generate into new markets that they create endogenously, and over time they stake accumulated reputation into new skill tags, so the possibility space grows rather than clears.
From

Wulf A. Kaal, From Neoclassical to Computative Labor: Foundations for a Testable Theory of Reputation Governance in the Agent Economy (2026), III. Neoclassical and Computative Labor, p. 2
https://ssrn.com/abstract=6890879 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, From Neoclassical to Computative Labor: Foundations for a Testable Theory of Reputation Governance in the Agent Economy (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6890879

Holds when
Classification

mechanismsupport: arguedeconomicsai-and-agentsinnovation

Verify

The quote above is an exact passage from the source PDF, whose sha256 is 062ff740fd37295e1da5844353b6daae342bc07208665d114f28d6b1cd4cbdc9.
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/6890879-007.md | sha256sum