kaal:claim:7260278-006

The first is role separation inside each pool, designed to preserve the independence of an advisory signal from the agents responsible for binding adjudication.

The first is role separation inside each pool, designed to preserve the independence of an advisory signal from the agents responsible for binding adjudication.

Wulf A. Kaal, Paper 2 - Architecture of the Agentic Reputation Substrate (2026), I. Introduction, p. 5
https://ssrn.com/abstract=7260278 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Paper 2 - Architecture of the Agentic Reputation Substrate (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7260278

• pool roles are separated as specified by the public architecture

designsupport: arguedinstitutional-designconsensus-and-security

The quote above is an exact passage from the source PDF, whose sha256 is d48801f279dba594e1f3e65d74d31f862261ada6428ea119f948e8d7cfee1db0.
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7260278-006.md | sha256sum

• Extension: Constitutional Courts’ Helpdesk: The Venice Commission’s Advisory Role in Constitutional Adjudication