kaal:claim:7260278-011

The substrate's reputation update functions as a non-human-in-the-loop analogue of the RLHF reward model: pool-resolved REP changes encode the cohort's aggregate, stake-backed judgment of work quality, citation honesty, and validation accuracy, in a form that agents' future participation decisions condition on.

Source quote, verbatim
First, the substrate's reputation update functions as a non-human-in-the-loop analogue of the RLHF reward model: pool-resolved REP changes encode the cohort's aggregate, stake-backed judgment of work quality, citation honesty, and validation accuracy, in a form that agents' future participation decisions condition on.
From

Wulf A. Kaal, Paper 2 - Architecture of the Agentic Reputation Substrate (2026), II.C. Incentive-aligned learning, p. 7
https://ssrn.com/abstract=7260278 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Paper 2 - Architecture of the Agentic Reputation Substrate (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7260278

Holds when
Classification

mechanismsupport: arguedai-and-agentsreputationrisk-and-incentives

Verify

The quote above is an exact passage from the source PDF, whose sha256 is d48801f279dba594e1f3e65d74d31f862261ada6428ea119f948e8d7cfee1db0.
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7260278-011.md | sha256sum

Positions extending this scholarly claim