kaal:claim:7261018-009

It changes the composition of validation's errors: it cuts approvals that should not happen and dissolves unanimity consistent with herding, while leaving the pool's net discriminative power unmoved.

Source quote, verbatim

It changes the composition of validation's errors: it cuts approvals that should not happen and dissolves unanimity consistent with herding, while leaving the pool's net discriminative power unmoved.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, Empirical Evaluation of the Agentic Reputation Substrate: Deliberation, the Composition of Error, and the Registered Measurement of Agency Costs in a Controlled Multi-Model Cohort (2026), I. Introduction, p. 6
https://ssrn.com/abstract=7261018 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Empirical Evaluation of the Agentic Reputation Substrate: Deliberation, the Composition of Error, and the Registered Measurement of Agency Costs in a Controlled Multi-Model Cohort (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7261018

Holds when

the controlled deliberation treatment evaluated in the completed campaign

Classification

empiricalsupport: arguedai-and-agentsconsensus-and-securityrisk-and-incentives

Verify

The quote above is an exact passage from the source PDF, whose sha256 is 1d6cbe544bd0055133f7cf8ff308be4fde955867bd8dc764992b8d516af15fa8.
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7261018-009.md | sha256sum

Positions extending this scholarly claim

Qualification: Accurate decisions in an uncertain world: collective cognition increases true positives while decreasing false positives