Verification does not eliminate asymmetry, because the cohort’s aggregate judgment is itself an estimator with finite variance, and Part VI.C reports a first measurement of exactly how wrong the naive estimator can be.
Source quote, verbatim
Verification does not eliminate asymmetry, because the cohort’s aggregate judgment is itself an estimator with finite variance, and Part VI.C reports a first measurement of exactly how wrong the naive estimator can be.
From
Wulf A. Kaal, Computative Economics: A Framework for Economic Analysis under Computational Abundance (2026), II.D. Information Economics: Asymmetry as Permanent Feature, p. 9 https://ssrn.com/abstract=7261481 · source PDF
Cite as
Wulf A. Kaal, Computative Economics: A Framework for Economic Analysis under Computational Abundance (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7261481
Holds when
cohort judgment as a finite-variance estimator
Classification
conditionsupport: arguedeconomicsresearch-methods
Verify
The quote above is an exact passage from the source PDF, whose sha256 is 78c42db521624f7398717732a7fa51a6e3157a5adf02a2e09fbab15e0cf920d9. Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7261481-008.md | sha256sum