kaal:claim:7261481-008

Verification does not eliminate asymmetry, because the cohort’s aggregate judgment is itself an estimator with finite variance, and Part VI.C reports a first measurement of exactly how wrong the naive estimator can be.

Source quote, verbatim
Verification does not eliminate asymmetry, because the cohort’s aggregate judgment is itself an estimator with finite variance, and Part VI.C reports a first measurement of exactly how wrong the naive estimator can be.
From

Wulf A. Kaal, Computative Economics: A Framework for Economic Analysis under Computational Abundance (2026), II.D. Information Economics: Asymmetry as Permanent Feature, p. 9
https://ssrn.com/abstract=7261481 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Computative Economics: A Framework for Economic Analysis under Computational Abundance (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7261481

Holds when
Classification

conditionsupport: arguedeconomicsresearch-methods

Verify

The quote above is an exact passage from the source PDF, whose sha256 is 78c42db521624f7398717732a7fa51a6e3157a5adf02a2e09fbab15e0cf920d9.
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7261481-008.md | sha256sum

Positions extending this scholarly claim