# kaal:claim:7314479-016

**Claim.** Withdrawal of a grant at the point of issue does not reliably propagate to components already operating under it, and few systems can demonstrate that it did.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- revocation in composed multi-component systems

**Source quote.**

> Revocation compounds the problem: withdrawal of a grant at the point of issue does not reliably propagate to components already operating under it, and few systems can demonstrate that it did.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *Institutional Requirements for Sovereign Local Agent Runtimes* (2026), V. The Accountability Gap, Stated Precisely, page 10

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Institutional Requirements for Sovereign Local Agent Runtimes (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7314479

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `debace24a155ae924a155b1fafe98856d98cf83689feff2f87a32f1c06171ce6` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202026%20-%20Institutional%20Requirements%20for%20Sovereign%20Local%20Agent%20Runtimes.pdf

**Topics.** consensus-and-security, governance-design

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.