kaal:claim:7314479-026

A defined path must exist to challenge an outcome and must terminate in a remedy rather than in an explanation, because an institution is constituted by the consequences it can impose.

Source quote, verbatim
A defined path must exist to challenge an outcome, and the path must terminate in a remedy rather than in an explanation. The terminal clause distinguishes this requirement from transparency. Explanation is valuable and insufficient. An institution is constituted by the consequences it can impose
From

Wulf A. Kaal, Institutional Requirements for Sovereign Local Agent Runtimes (2026), VI. Six Institutional Requirements, Requirement 6, p. 12
https://ssrn.com/abstract=7314479 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Institutional Requirements for Sovereign Local Agent Runtimes (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7314479

Holds when
Classification

normativesupport: arguedgovernance-designinstitutional-designdao

Verify

The quote above is an exact passage from the source PDF, whose sha256 is debace24a155ae924a155b1fafe98856d98cf83689feff2f87a32f1c06171ce6.
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7314479-026.md | sha256sum

Positions extending this scholarly claim