# kaal:claim:7314479-041

**Claim.** Reputation standing should anchor to the SHA-256 of the tool artifact, paired with a publisher-level link and a controlled migration rule under which standing carries across versions only by an explicit, recorded act.

**Type.** design  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- introduction of a reputation layer into a sovereign runtime

**Source quote.**

> Hash-bound standing therefore needs a publisher-level link and a controlled migration rule, under which standing carries across versions only by an explicit, recorded act. The identity-cost precondition Part IX names is met by that pairing, not by the hash alone.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *Institutional Requirements for Sovereign Local Agent Runtimes* (2026), VIII. Engineering Contributions, Contribution 4, page 19

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Institutional Requirements for Sovereign Local Agent Runtimes (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7314479

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `debace24a155ae924a155b1fafe98856d98cf83689feff2f87a32f1c06171ce6` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202026%20-%20Institutional%20Requirements%20for%20Sovereign%20Local%20Agent%20Runtimes.pdf

**Topics.** reputation, consensus-and-security, ai-and-agents

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.
