kaal:claim:7314479-050

Before legal requirements can be evaluated automatically against a runtime's behavior, the runtime must produce a record of that behavior that survives the session and admits third-party interpretation, making durable provenance a precondition for the regulatory interface.

Before legal requirements can be evaluated automatically against a runtime's behavior, the runtime must produce a record of that behavior which survives the session and admits third-party interpretation. Requirement 2 is therefore a precondition for the regulatory interface, not merely for debugging.

Wulf A. Kaal, Institutional Requirements for Sovereign Local Agent Runtimes (2026), X. The Institutional Interface: Proof Without Surrender, p. 23
https://ssrn.com/abstract=7314479 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Institutional Requirements for Sovereign Local Agent Runtimes (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7314479

• machine-interpretable legal requirements applied to agent runtimes

conditionsupport: argueddynamic-regulationlaw-and-legal-systemscompliance

The quote above is an exact passage from the source PDF, whose sha256 is debace24a155ae924a155b1fafe98856d98cf83689feff2f87a32f1c06171ce6.
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7314479-050.md | sha256sum