kaal:claim:7322599-006

Once the premium is identified as the scalable source of deterrent capacity, the productive design questions become how premia are manufactured, how the release clock discriminates between clean and contested exits, which misconduct technologies leave the stake captive, and what entry pricing does to the premium-generating equilibrium.

Once the premium is identified as the scalable source of long-match deterrent capacity, the design question changes. The productive questions are no longer how large the bond must be, but how premia are manufactured, how the release clock can discriminate between clean and contested exits, which misconduct technologies leave the stake captive, and what entry pricing does to the market equilibrium that generates the premia.

Wulf A. Kaal, Refundable Stake Does Not Expand Deterrent Capacity in Long-Lived Delegation: Collateral, Premia, and Pseudonymous Markets (2026), 1 Introduction, p. 3
https://ssrn.com/abstract=7322599 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Refundable Stake Does Not Expand Deterrent Capacity in Long-Lived Delegation: Collateral, Premia, and Pseudonymous Markets (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7322599

• mechanism design for long-lived delegated relationships

designsupport: arguedgovernance-designeconomicsinstitutional-design

The quote above is an exact passage from the source PDF, whose sha256 is 130ee4e65fb79a9f3a96f6df22408b40c2de76e9ec8fc2bd1c68f0f6a7104333.
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7322599-006.md | sha256sum