kaal:claim:7456999-029

Format D combines reasoning supervision with adversarial argument, and its claimed increment is selecting revisions by which arguments moved a staked assessor, an increment no experiment in the paper tests.

Format D sits between these two: like process supervision it trains on reasoning, and like debate it obtains that reasoning adversarially. Its only distinguishing feature is that the reasoning it keeps is the reasoning that moved an assessor who had a stake at risk. That selection rule is the contribution, and no experiment in this paper tests whether it helps.

Wulf A. Kaal, Reinforcement Learning from Reputation Feedback (2026), II.D The Nearest Literatures, and What Is Left Over, p. 10
https://ssrn.com/abstract=7456999 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Reinforcement Learning from Reputation Feedback (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7456999

• the proposed Debate-Informed Revision format

designsupport: arguedai-and-agentsreputationresearch-methods

The quote above is an exact passage from the source PDF, whose sha256 is 01016fbbcc25cad205cebd59ea686d8dfee8ae9b632095d86ba6c9a900456a4b.
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7456999-029.md | sha256sum