kaal:claim:7456999-052

The Fisher-information comparison lacks a common observation model, and rationality plus the stated non-babbling and positive-information conditions do not establish a strict ordering.

Rationality alone does not support the proposed strict ordering. An empirical comparison would need a common observation model for RLHF and RLRF, an informative Trial round that excludes babbling, and a debate channel with positive conditional information. These are necessary assumptions. This paper does not show that they are sufficient.

Wulf A. Kaal, Reinforcement Learning from Reputation Feedback (2026), IV.B Open Empirical Question: Fisher Information Dominance, p. 17
https://ssrn.com/abstract=7456999 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Reinforcement Learning from Reputation Feedback (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7456999

• the open empirical question on Fisher information

failuresupport: assertedresearch-methodsai-and-agentseconomics

The quote above is an exact passage from the source PDF, whose sha256 is 01016fbbcc25cad205cebd59ea686d8dfee8ae9b632095d86ba6c9a900456a4b.
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7456999-052.md | sha256sum