# kaal:claim:7456999-074

**Claim.** Experiment T did not show that consensus-weighted selection outperformed equal weighting because the +0.0017 difference had a ninety-five percent interval from -0.0051 to +0.0085.

**Type.** empirical  **Support.** evidenced

**Holds when.**

- Experiment T's seven-model panel and two-constraint task

**Source quote.**

> Experiment T does not show that consensus-weighted selection outperformed equal-weighted selection within this panel and task. Across 589 surviving prompts, joint satisfaction was 0.7963 under consensus weighting and 0.7946 under equal weighting, a difference of +0.0017 with a 95% interval from -0.0051 to +0.0085.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *Reinforcement Learning from Reputation Feedback* (2026), VIII. Limitations and Future Work, page 30

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Reinforcement Learning from Reputation Feedback (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7456999

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `01016fbbcc25cad205cebd59ea686d8dfee8ae9b632095d86ba6c9a900456a4b` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202026%20-%20Reinforcement%20Learning%20from%20Reputation%20Feedback.pdf

**Topics.** empirical-evidence, research-methods, ai-and-agents

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.