kaal:claim:7596939-035

Claim. Against the hardest rival the Article constructs, a professional representative satisfying the full bundle of Corollary 2's assumptions, direct standing has no structural advantage.

Type. condition · Support. argued

Holds when

• Corollary 2
• existing franchise large enough that Proposition 7's condition holds without incremental premium
• no configuration the deployer can alter
• specified legal-wrongfulness observation and false-alarm rate at stated administrative cost
• files on every flagged slash
• agent satisfies the corresponding signal and filing conditions
• neither exposure synthetically transferred
• at the theorem's stated parameter setting

Source quote

Against such a professional, direct standing has no structural advantage.

From. Wulf A. Kaal, Should an Intelligent Agent Have Legal Rights? (2026). Full text.

Cite as. Wulf A. Kaal, Should an Intelligent Agent Have Legal Rights? (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7596939

Verify. sha256 of source PDF aa3ba2287a9f0fa2529e1c92bd6c509cdc4697fafe2de73d11877c44e592f39c at https://wulfkaal.com/papers/7596939.pdf

Content hash. de87c8c2735155200b35f0878a68d94b0bce82e5cce8267635872539f3b93089