kaal:claim:7598518-047

Claim. In the final audit rounds of the last three sections of the working draft, one audit family's command-line engines returned no verdict because their usage balance was exhausted, so those rounds hold two passing verdicts rather than three and left identified low-severity findings unadopted.

Type. empirical · Support. stated

Holds when

• The shortfall is disclosed in the paper's own limits section and in the audit records.
• It concerns the conduct of the study's review, not the filter's performance.

Source quote

in the final audit rounds of the last three sections of the working draft, one audit family's command-line engines returned no verdict because their usage balance was exhausted, so those rounds hold two passing verdicts rather than three, and they left identified low-severity findings unadopted, as their audit records state.

From. Wulf A. Kaal, Can Reputation Prevent Model Collapse? A Preregistered Test of Reputation-Weighted Data Filtering (2026). Full text.

Cite as. Wulf A. Kaal, Can Reputation Prevent Model Collapse? A Preregistered Test of Reputation-Weighted Data Filtering (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7598518

Verify. sha256 of source PDF cd22d148b2b55c2e27f087dcaa61cdf44ad7022b400b355c31a9cd7e43a31749 at https://wulfkaal.com/papers/7598518.pdf

Content hash. dd96b5f99e69a56d0118fd419ee241f6d2db1c9ef12ea2ce68f6c1416d8a2fe7