# kaal:claim:kaal-2013-acomparativeperspectiveo-011

**Claim.** Germany has taken a much stricter approach than the United States to cases involving a breach of the duty of oversight, even though the German business judgment rule formally requires a showing of the same elements as the American one.

**Type.** empirical  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- comparison of German and Delaware corporate law

**Source quote.**

> For instance, Germany has taken a much stricter approach to cases involving a breach of the duty of oversight.

**From.** Kaal, *A Comparative Perspective on the Limitations of the Duty of Oversight – A Comment on Lisa Fairfax* (2013), A Comparative Perspective on the Duty to Monitor, page 5

**Cite as.** Kaal, A Comparative Perspective on the Limitations of the Duty of Oversight – A Comment on Lisa Fairfax (2013)

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `ac5c955fe01209c54c78c4575c0b8bf570e5f1259c3f855510697cf51a32e59a` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202013%20-%20A%20Comparative%20Perspective%20on%20the%20Limitations%20of%20the%20Duty%20of%20Oversight%20%E2%80%93%20A%20Comment%20on%20Lisa%20Fairfax.pdf

**Topics.** corporate-governance

**Keywords.** comparative-corporate-law, german-law, business-judgment-rule, duty-of-oversight

**Related claims.**

- supersedes: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1558614-006

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.