# kaal:claim:kaal-2013-acomparativeperspectiveo-021

**Claim.** Increasing oversight liability would give courts an opportunity to clarify the oversight doctrine, so that it could evolve into a mature and coherent doctrine rather than remaining immature and incoherent.

**Type.** mechanism  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- more oversight suits reach the merits

**Source quote.**

> With an increase in liability, courts would also have an opportunity to clarify the oversight doctrine.

**From.** Kaal, *A Comparative Perspective on the Limitations of the Duty of Oversight – A Comment on Lisa Fairfax* (2013), A Comparative Perspective on the Duty to Monitor, page 7

**Cite as.** Kaal, A Comparative Perspective on the Limitations of the Duty of Oversight – A Comment on Lisa Fairfax (2013)

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `ac5c955fe01209c54c78c4575c0b8bf570e5f1259c3f855510697cf51a32e59a` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202013%20-%20A%20Comparative%20Perspective%20on%20the%20Limitations%20of%20the%20Duty%20of%20Oversight%20%E2%80%93%20A%20Comment%20on%20Lisa%20Fairfax.pdf

**Topics.** law-and-legal-systems, corporate-governance

**Keywords.** legal-doctrine, judicial-clarification, duty-of-oversight, director-guidance

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.