# kaal:claim:kaal-2013-acomparativeperspectiveo-024

**Claim.** The author endorses the conclusion that attempts to enhance oversight in the United States may fail and that emphasizing improved oversight as a means of enhancing corporate governance could be ill-advised.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- United States corporate governance

**Source quote.**

> This weighs in favour of Professor Fairfax's conclusion that attempts to enhance oversight in the United States may fail and an emphasis on emphasizing improving oversight as a means of enhancing corporate governance could be ill-advised.

**From.** Kaal, *A Comparative Perspective on the Limitations of the Duty of Oversight – A Comment on Lisa Fairfax* (2013), A Comparative Perspective on the Duty to Monitor, page 8

**Cite as.** Kaal, A Comparative Perspective on the Limitations of the Duty of Oversight – A Comment on Lisa Fairfax (2013)

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `ac5c955fe01209c54c78c4575c0b8bf570e5f1259c3f855510697cf51a32e59a` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202013%20-%20A%20Comparative%20Perspective%20on%20the%20Limitations%20of%20the%20Duty%20of%20Oversight%20%E2%80%93%20A%20Comment%20on%20Lisa%20Fairfax.pdf

**Failure mode.** failure of oversight enhancement as a governance strategy  (family: board-and-oversight-failure)

**Topics.** corporate-governance, governance-design

**Keywords.** duty-of-oversight, reform-limits, corporate-governance, oversight-enhancement

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.