# kaal:claim:kaal-2013-acomparativeperspectiveo-028

**Claim.** Following enactment, governance adjustments are often later repealed or diluted, and anticipation of future developments plays no significant role in the top down approach to regulation.

**Type.** mechanism  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- top down regulatory approach

**Source quote.**

> Worse yet, following the enactment, governance adjustments are often later repealed or diluted. 41 Anticipation of future developments and pre-emption of possible future crises does not play a significant role in the top down approach to

**From.** Kaal, *A Comparative Perspective on the Limitations of the Duty of Oversight – A Comment on Lisa Fairfax* (2013), Dynamic Regulation, page 9

**Cite as.** Kaal, A Comparative Perspective on the Limitations of the Duty of Oversight – A Comment on Lisa Fairfax (2013)

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `ac5c955fe01209c54c78c4575c0b8bf570e5f1259c3f855510697cf51a32e59a` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202013%20-%20A%20Comparative%20Perspective%20on%20the%20Limitations%20of%20the%20Duty%20of%20Oversight%20%E2%80%93%20A%20Comment%20on%20Lisa%20Fairfax.pdf

**Failure mode.** regulatory sine curve of enactment and dilution  (family: regulatory-lag)

**Topics.** institutional-design

**Keywords.** regulatory-sine-curve, reform-dilution, top-down-regulation, financial-regulation

**Related claims.**

- restates: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2273857-028
- restates: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2273857-001
- restates: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2273857-007

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.