# kaal:claim:kaal-2014-dynamicregulationviagove-016

**Claim.** The shortcomings of the existing rulemaking framework cannot be adequately addressed from within that framework, because its structure rests on the assumption that rules ought to be stable and presumptively optimal.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** argued

**Source quote.**

> They are unlikely to be adequately addressed within the existing institutional infrastructure be- cause the structure of the existing regulatory framework is based on the as- sumption that rules ought to be stable and presumptively optimal to address a given regulatory problem.

**From.** Kaal, *Dynamic Regulation via Governmental Contracts* (2014), II.4 Supplementing the Regulatory Framework, page 16

**Cite as.** Kaal, Dynamic Regulation via Governmental Contracts (2014)

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `7320aec036ccf2f6739f0854ea8749903e8902e77c2ec39543b64b358459c408` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202014%20-%20Dynamic%20Regulation%20via%20Governmental%20Contracts.pdf

**Failure mode.** shortcomings are internal to the framework  (family: rule-obsolescence-and-ossification)

**Topics.** institutional-design

**Keywords.** institutional-infrastructure, stable-rules, regulatory-reform, systemic-shortcomings

**Related claims.**

- extended_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2957645-008
- supported_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2740477-017

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.