# kaal:claim:kaal-2014-dynamicregulationviagove-025

**Claim.** The governance improvements documented in governmental contracts counteract or at least discount the standard criticisms of them, including unequal bargaining power, the government's lack of governance expertise, and the potential for prosecutorial abuse.

**Type.** empirical  **Support.** argued

**Source quote.**

> Concerns that may be dis- counted include the unequal bargaining power between the contracting par- ties78, the government's lack of governance expertise and training79, the po- tential for prosecutorial abuse80

**From.** Kaal, *Dynamic Regulation via Governmental Contracts* (2014), III. Governmental Contracts, page 21

**Cite as.** Kaal, Dynamic Regulation via Governmental Contracts (2014)

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `7320aec036ccf2f6739f0854ea8749903e8902e77c2ec39543b64b358459c408` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202014%20-%20Dynamic%20Regulation%20via%20Governmental%20Contracts.pdf

**Topics.** governance-design, corporate-governance

**Keywords.** governmental-contracts, prosecutorial-discretion, criticism, corporate-governance

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.