# kaal:claim:kaal-2014-dynamicregulationviagove-027

**Claim.** The effectiveness of existing preemptive remedial measures is in question, because the majority of governmental contracts are executed only after those measures have already proved unsuccessful.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** evidenced

**Source quote.**

> the majority of governmental contracts are executed after preemptive remedial measures have proved unsuccessful85, calling into question the effectiveness of existing preemptive remedial measures.

**From.** Kaal, *Dynamic Regulation via Governmental Contracts* (2014), III.1 Preemtive Remedial Measures, page 22

**Cite as.** Kaal, Dynamic Regulation via Governmental Contracts (2014)

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `7320aec036ccf2f6739f0854ea8749903e8902e77c2ec39543b64b358459c408` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202014%20-%20Dynamic%20Regulation%20via%20Governmental%20Contracts.pdf

**Failure mode.** ineffective preemptive remediation  (family: enforcement-gap)

**Topics.** compliance

**Keywords.** preemptive-remedial-measures, governmental-contracts, compliance-failure, enforcement

**Related claims.**

- restates: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2486570-025
- supersedes: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2486570-026

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.