{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "DefinedTerm",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/administrative-procedure-act",
 "identifier": "kaal:entity:administrative-procedure-act",
 "name": "Administrative procedure act",
 "termCode": "administrative-procedure-act",
 "inDefinedTermSet": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/index.json"
 },
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0757-275X"
 },
 "dateModified": "2026-07-29",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/administrative-procedure-act.md",
 "sha256": "154ccad680309a25a953be63671c7478fb8855aca2f09a895c3b92d3eef98e1d",
 "additionalProperty": [
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "status",
   "value": "derived"
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "claim_count",
   "value": 4
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "work_count",
   "value": 3
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "year_span",
   "value": [
    "2016",
    "2016"
   ]
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "non_current_claims",
   "value": 0
  }
 ],
 "subjectOf": [
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2740477-033",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:2740477-033",
   "text": "Dynamic regulatory supplements do not violate the procedural protections mandated by the Administrative Procedure Act, because the full lawmaking process still applies and dynamic regulation only supplements and optimizes the existing rulemaking process.",
   "abstract": "Dynamic regulatory supplements would not violate mandated regulatory procedures in the APA135 as the full lawmaking process still applies.136 Dynamic regulation functions as a regulatory supplement to help optimize the existing rulemaking process.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Venture Capital as Dynamic Regulation of Disruptive Innovation (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2740477",
   "datePublished": "2016",
   "claim_type": "design",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "United States administrative law under the APA"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "c72871b76fa2ad5a8a69ee8d3defc8f64e624be9052ce763e79cf6c58883f726",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2808132-036",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:2808132-036",
   "text": "Dynamic regulatory supplements would not violate the procedural mandates of the Administrative Procedure Act, because the full lawmaking process still applies; dynamic regulation supplements rather than replaces the existing rulemaking process.",
   "abstract": "Dynamic regulatory supplements would not violate mandated regulatory procedures in the APA126 as the full lawmaking process still applies.127 Dynamic regulation functions as a regulatory supplement to help optimize the existing rulemaking process.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132",
   "datePublished": "2016",
   "claim_type": "design",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "United States administrative law under the Administrative Procedure Act"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "3515f2317ed9c1d33ae55d70467cdf1f6c4e350065ea6a887d5d7619599ad7d2",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2808132-051",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:2808132-051",
   "text": "Existing regulatory processes are suboptimally equipped to address the challenges of exponential disruptive innovation, and the notice and comment procedures of the Administrative Procedure Act and the SEC illustrate the resulting suboptimal regulatory response rates.",
   "abstract": "This paper also shows that the existing regulatory processes are suboptimally equipped to address the challenges of exponential disruptive innovation. The notice and comment procedures of the APA131 and the SEC are only some of the examples illustrating the",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132",
   "datePublished": "2016",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "notice and comment rulemaking under the APA and at the SEC",
    "regulatory challenges presented by venture-capital-backed companies"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "3515f2317ed9c1d33ae55d70467cdf1f6c4e350065ea6a887d5d7619599ad7d2",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2831040-005",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:2831040-005",
   "text": "The most widely recognized drawbacks of traditional rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act are its lack of speed, its cumbersomeness, and the volume of litigation generated by its notice and comment procedures.",
   "abstract": "The most traditional and widely recognized drawbacks of the traditional rulemaking system under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) include its lacking speed, cumbersomeness, and the quantity of litigation it generates via its notice and comment procedures",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Dynamic Regulation for Innovation (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2831040",
   "datePublished": "2016",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "United States APA notice and comment rulemaking"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "de5156f14f44a5753cab55b6c4b03049eda58a143b99e08ef427aee1d261e1bf",
   "status": "current"
  }
 ],
 "description": "4 claims in the published works of Wulf A. Kaal carry the concept tag 'administrative-procedure-act'. Derived node: a roster, not an adjudicated definition."
}