# Administrative procedure act

`kaal:entity:administrative-procedure-act`

**Status.** derived

This node is assembled mechanically from the 4 claims that carry the concept tag `administrative-procedure-act`. It is a roster of what the corpus says under this term. It is **not** an adjudicated definition: no single statement here has been ruled canonical, and no first-appearance call has been made. Read the claims and judge for yourself.

## Every claim under this term

4 claims across 3 works, 2016 to 2016.

**2016**

- [2740477-033](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2740477-033) [design/argued] -- Dynamic regulatory supplements do not violate the procedural protections mandated by the Administrative Procedure Act, because the full lawmaking process still applies and dynamic regulation only supplements and optimizes the existing rulemaking process.
  > Dynamic regulatory supplements would not violate mandated regulatory procedures in the APA135 as the full lawmaking process still applies.136 Dynamic regulation functions as a regulatory supplement to help optimize the existing rulemaking process.
  Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Venture Capital as Dynamic Regulation of Disruptive Innovation (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2740477
- [2808132-036](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2808132-036) [design/argued] -- Dynamic regulatory supplements would not violate the procedural mandates of the Administrative Procedure Act, because the full lawmaking process still applies; dynamic regulation supplements rather than replaces the existing rulemaking process.
  > Dynamic regulatory supplements would not violate mandated regulatory procedures in the APA126 as the full lawmaking process still applies.127 Dynamic regulation functions as a regulatory supplement to help optimize the existing rulemaking process.
  Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132
- [2808132-051](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2808132-051) [failure/argued] *(failure mode)* -- Existing regulatory processes are suboptimally equipped to address the challenges of exponential disruptive innovation, and the notice and comment procedures of the Administrative Procedure Act and the SEC illustrate the resulting suboptimal regulatory response rates.
  > This paper also shows that the existing regulatory processes are suboptimally equipped to address the challenges of exponential disruptive innovation. The notice and comment procedures of the APA131 and the SEC are only some of the examples illustrating the
  Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132
- [2831040-005](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2831040-005) [failure/argued] *(failure mode)* -- The most widely recognized drawbacks of traditional rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act are its lack of speed, its cumbersomeness, and the volume of litigation generated by its notice and comment procedures.
  > The most traditional and widely recognized drawbacks of the traditional rulemaking system under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) include its lacking speed, cumbersomeness, and the quantity of litigation it generates via its notice and comment procedures
  Wulf A. Kaal, Dynamic Regulation for Innovation (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2831040

## Verify

Every claim above resolves to a record carrying a verbatim source quote, the sha256 of the source PDF, and a preformatted citation. Nothing here asks to be taken on trust.

    curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/administrative-procedure-act.md | sha256sum

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of this entity node. Its sha256 is the content hash.