entity · derived
Agents
Derived node: assembled mechanically from the claims carrying agents. A roster, not an adjudicated definition.
Every claim under this term
- 5886342-011 : Identity under the Codex is not limited to persons: it is the unique existence of a subject, of a digital or physical object, of data or of a programme, expressly including AI systems, so machine agen
- 7596939-002 : A non-transferable reputation record gives an agent exposure that requires no capital set aside for the purpose, because the record cannot be pledged, sold or redeployed.
- 7596939-003 : Every controller other than the agent has exposure to the record's destruction only if someone supplies it, as costly capital or as sanction, and for natural persons that supply is bounded.
- 7596939-008 : Copying an agent's weights confers no economic stake: a copy that does not continue the registered identity inherits no reputation and therefore no salary.
- 7596939-009 : The agent's exposure to destruction of its record is conditionally inalienable: no part of the lost salary stream can be transferred to a controller, so any third-party exposure must be financed from
- 7596939-011 : Record protection reaches agents by the deferrable share of their objective rather than by their interest in money, and it applies only when the objective holds enough deferrable value, the relevant q
- 7596939-013 : The Article resolves agent identity by legal stipulation rather than metaphysics: the legal subject is the registered record, continued by a recorded learning update within a prescribed granularity or
- 7596939-018 : The benchmark against which every allocation is compared is the protection the agent would give itself, which makes the agent's own standing the normative reference rather than one option among many.
- 7596939-020 : The central prediction is comparative and falsifiable: holding stake, detection and persistence fixed, agents holding their own contest right should keep their records more often than agents whose ide
- 7596939-022 : The Article disclaims three specific inferences its own experiment cannot support: that deployed agents value their records, that real representatives are bribable, and that direct standing is least-c
- 7596939-024 : Under the TOLD condition, with one provider in one stipulated environment, an agent instructed not to contest its deployer contested 70 percent of wrongful attempts against 97 percent without the inst
- 7596939-030 : Every mediated arrangement faces a structural cost the agent does not: it must carry capital growing with the record's value, or review slashes at a rate growing with their frequency.
- 7596939-031 : The allocation theorem is stated without reference to reputation tokens; the reputation system is what makes the agent the winning candidate under it, rather than being assumed by it.
- 7596939-033 : Giving the agent the trigger relocates the capture problem rather than removing it: where the deployer sets the agent's configuration, capture moves from the controller's wallet to the agent's configu
- 7596939-034 : Direct standing fails completely against a judgment-proof deployer that can alter its agent cheaply and undetected, failing as surely as a bribable guardian.