{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "DefinedTerm",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/boundary-cases",
 "identifier": "kaal:entity:boundary-cases",
 "name": "Boundary cases",
 "termCode": "boundary-cases",
 "inDefinedTermSet": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/index.json"
 },
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/boundary-cases.md",
 "sha256": "a41fd75da8c2d3803c660cc55c6f8456af0c542a2e7ee0ae792c4e4f00fa77a6",
 "additionalProperty": [
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "status",
   "value": "derived"
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "claim_count",
   "value": 2
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "work_count",
   "value": 2
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "year_span",
   "value": [
    "2022",
    "2026"
   ]
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "non_current_claims",
   "value": 0
  }
 ],
 "subjectOf": [
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4021599-008",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:4021599-008",
   "text": "The boundaries between the different types of tokens are regularly blurred, so the securities token versus utility token distinction functions as a typical case distinction rather than a clean partition.",
   "abstract": "While the lines between the different types of tokens are blurred regularly,9 securities token are typically investment contracts,",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Securities Versus Utility Tokens (2022). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4021599",
   "datePublished": "2022",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "asserted",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "bb03790af46b3710e306121cfae25f850e3e7477e0f95313af42b9feeb6bc0c4",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7596939-004",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:7596939-004",
   "text": "The Article disclaims the moral reading of its own slogan: rights follow stake is a boundary case about allocation, claiming no moral right for any intelligence system, with most of the framework being regulatory permission.",
   "abstract": "Should intelligent agents have legal rights? This Article sets that question aside and asks a smaller one that matters more in practice. An intelligent agent that earns a reputation record has something to lose.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Should an Intelligent Agent Have Legal Rights? (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7596939",
   "datePublished": "2026",
   "claim_type": "condition",
   "confidence": "stated",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "scope of the Article's thesis"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "aa3ba2287a9f0fa2529e1c92bd6c509cdc4697fafe2de73d11877c44e592f39c",
   "status": "current"
  }
 ],
 "description": "2 claims in the published works of Wulf A. Kaal carry the concept tag 'boundary-cases'. Derived node: a roster, not an adjudicated definition."
}