{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "DefinedTerm",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/centralization",
 "identifier": "kaal:entity:centralization",
 "name": "Centralization",
 "termCode": "centralization",
 "inDefinedTermSet": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/index.json"
 },
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0757-275X"
 },
 "dateModified": "2026-07-29",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/centralization.md",
 "sha256": "bf286260e7d38f1f4da9ff14318d9176ad9e9e69c9856f5866cbcf0b061945fa",
 "additionalProperty": [
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "status",
   "value": "derived"
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "claim_count",
   "value": 90
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "work_count",
   "value": 37
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "year_span",
   "value": [
    "2017",
    "2026"
   ]
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "non_current_claims",
   "value": 0
  }
 ],
 "subjectOf": [
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-031",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:2992962-031",
   "text": "As blockchain use grows, node operation will eventually require special equipment affordable only by large corporations in the existing legal infrastructure, creating the possibility of dangerous centralization and a threat to anonymity.",
   "abstract": "which will eventually require special equipment that can only be afforded by large corporations in the existing legal infrastructure. With such power for large corporations comes the possibility of dangerous centralization and a threat to undermining anonymity.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962",
   "datePublished": "2017",
   "claim_type": "predictive",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "blockchains with eternal storage and rapidly growing size"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "80b92e67594394e38af41b769327936833de8e25d6cf3def966a6ba13bc83d17",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-039",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:2992962-039",
   "text": "Because no conceivable way exists to permanently hide an arbiter's reputation from the arbiter in an open system, the corruption risk created by high reputation arbiters becoming valued counselors for disputants is an insoluble problem with the authors' own proposal.",
   "abstract": "Because no conceivable way exists to permanently hide an arbiter's reputation from the arbiter in an open system, this is an insoluble problem with the proposal.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962",
   "datePublished": "2017",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "open reputation systems for anonymous arbiters"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "80b92e67594394e38af41b769327936833de8e25d6cf3def966a6ba13bc83d17",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3125827-009",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3125827-009",
   "text": "Even though proof of stake mitigates the economy of scale advantage, block production cartels can still arise in PoS systems through lotteries, through built in voting delegations, or because the stakes required to be a block producer can simply be bought.",
   "abstract": "However, block production cartels may still arise due to lotteries, or the fact that voting delegations are built into the system, or the fact that the stakes needed to be a block producer may be bought",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Secure Proof of Stake Protocol (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3125827",
   "datePublished": "2018",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "PoS systems that use lotteries, delegation, or purchasable stakes"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "598d9bd95e4af7a0a35328677c6bfc069f69f2e32c30c720b3a0be98a23a40cb",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3125827-010",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3125827-010",
   "text": "If a blockchain cannot restart or regenerate autonomously after going offline or losing most active nodes, it needs social coordination between nodes; that requirement threatens anonymity and forces reliance on famous nodes.",
   "abstract": "can the blockchain restart or regenerate autonomously13? Or is there a need for social coordination between the nodes? If so, anonymity is threatened and famous nodes are required.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Secure Proof of Stake Protocol (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3125827",
   "datePublished": "2018",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "blockchain goes offline for a long period or has too few active nodes"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "598d9bd95e4af7a0a35328677c6bfc069f69f2e32c30c720b3a0be98a23a40cb",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3125827-019",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3125827-019",
   "text": "Any blockchain whose soft forks are decided through private communication between famous token holding whales is ultimately less secure than legacy centralized systems, which at least address centralized security risks deliberately.",
   "abstract": "Any blockchain subject to such governance is ultimately less secure than legacy centralized systems which pointedly address centralized security risks.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Secure Proof of Stake Protocol (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3125827",
   "datePublished": "2018",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "off chain governance conducted privately among large holders and developers"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "598d9bd95e4af7a0a35328677c6bfc069f69f2e32c30c720b3a0be98a23a40cb",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3227933-002",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3227933-002",
   "text": "Earlier technological revolutions produced greater organizational centralization, because societies responded to the uncertain meaning, effects, and risks of new technology by pooling authority; the current digital transformation reverses this pattern.",
   "abstract": "Previous technological revolutions led to a concentration of such organizations, as society adapted to the uncertain meaning, effects, and risks of technological change by pooling (i.e., centralizing) authority.",
   "citation": "Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Why 'Blockchain' Will Disrupt Corporate Organizations (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3227933",
   "datePublished": "2018",
   "claim_type": "mechanism",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "applies to periods of technological uncertainty"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "a9e9660c4dc25a2202f1da4e762f5885256e05f68c53ca51942f5833a7a4c108",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3227933-027",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3227933-027",
   "text": "Centralized organizations also lose the competition for talent, because the younger generation views centralization as a threat to personal autonomy, choice and happiness and is increasingly sceptical of traditional hierarchies.",
   "abstract": "The younger \"Millennial\" generation view centralization as a threat to personal autonomy, choice, and happiness.",
   "citation": "Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Why 'Blockchain' Will Disrupt Corporate Organizations (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3227933",
   "datePublished": "2018",
   "claim_type": "empirical",
   "confidence": "evidenced",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "younger, Millennial workforce"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "a9e9660c4dc25a2202f1da4e762f5885256e05f68c53ca51942f5833a7a4c108",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3266953-012",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3266953-012",
   "text": "Because power exercised over a store of value inevitably produces economies of scale, cryptocurrencies and any other transferable store of value drive networks toward centralization.",
   "abstract": "Because of the store of value entailed in cryptocurrencies (and really any currencies or store of value), exercise of power over such value inevitably leads to centralization due to economies of scale.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Gopinath Sivalingam, Reputation Protocol for the Internet of Trust - Conceptual Whitepaper (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3266953",
   "datePublished": "2018",
   "claim_type": "mechanism",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "any fungible store of value, not only cryptocurrencies"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "781758dea356e55d79c73ad7f1debe7c83de398bd1cd9e0a9a6c2802f276b4c0",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3266953-020",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3266953-020",
   "text": "The fungibility of the staked currency is the main point of attack against proof of stake and leads inevitably to centralization.",
   "abstract": "The fungibility of currency is the main point of attacks on PoS and leads inevitably to centralization.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Gopinath Sivalingam, Reputation Protocol for the Internet of Trust - Conceptual Whitepaper (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3266953",
   "datePublished": "2018",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "proof of stake consensus using fungible currency"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "781758dea356e55d79c73ad7f1debe7c83de398bd1cd9e0a9a6c2802f276b4c0",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3402701-034",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3402701-034",
   "text": "Centralized hierarchies and decentralized flat organizations fail in opposite ways: hierarchies filter out information signals at the edge, while flat organizations amplify edge noise so important information never finds a champion to drive action.",
   "abstract": "Decentralized flat organizations have a tendency to fail from the inverse quality of amplifying the noise at the edge, so that important information cannot find its champion to lead to useful action",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Vadhindran K. Rao, Stable Cryptocurrencies - First Order Principles (2019). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3402701",
   "datePublished": "2019",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "72ed2581b4cac2bd18a5b2640be959487a3cbc34c86ab5e5664924bcdb53c8e0",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3405401-023",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3405401-023",
   "text": "Because cryptocurrencies, like any currency or store of value, entail transferable value, the exercise of power over that value inevitably leads to centralization through economies of scale.",
   "abstract": "Because of the store of value entailed in cryptocurrencies (and really any currencies or store of value), exercise of power over such value inevitably leads to centralization due to economies of scale.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Commerce – A Primer on Why Decentralized Reputation Verification Systems Are Needed (2019). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3405401",
   "datePublished": "2019",
   "claim_type": "mechanism",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "any transferable store of value, including fiat currencies"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "bc2d6f0ddc0852fb4085c4543c7c1dec19aaf8745eb67e3acc637e552bd7fb7d",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3405401-024",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3405401-024",
   "text": "Reputation used as a metric and store of value does not lead to centralization because it must be earned, it can be lost, and it cannot be converted into a fungible store of value exchangeable for goods.",
   "abstract": "Reputation as a metric and store of value does not suffer the same consequences and does not lead to centralization because it must be earned, it can be lost, yet it cannot be turned into a fungible store of value that allows the exchange for goods etc.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Commerce – A Primer on Why Decentralized Reputation Verification Systems Are Needed (2019). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3405401",
   "datePublished": "2019",
   "claim_type": "mechanism",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "reputation is non fungible and non transferable"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "bc2d6f0ddc0852fb4085c4543c7c1dec19aaf8745eb67e3acc637e552bd7fb7d",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3405401-026",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3405401-026",
   "text": "Centralized capitalist institutions have been built entirely around centralized and hierarchical reputation systems, which is why replacing them requires a decentralized reputation substitute.",
   "abstract": "Centralized capitalist institutions have been built entirely around centralized and hierarchical reputation systems.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Commerce – A Primer on Why Decentralized Reputation Verification Systems Are Needed (2019). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3405401",
   "datePublished": "2019",
   "claim_type": "empirical",
   "confidence": "asserted",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "bc2d6f0ddc0852fb4085c4543c7c1dec19aaf8745eb67e3acc637e552bd7fb7d",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3411897-001",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3411897-001",
   "text": "Decentralization is not merely the redistribution of centrally organized authority or revenue, nor the delegation of centralized authority to managers at all organizational levels; the author stipulates these negative boundaries to separate decentralization from centralized reform.",
   "abstract": "Decentralization is not just the redistribution of centrally organized authority or redistribution of centrally collected revenue · Decentralization is not just the delegation of centralized authority to managers on all levels of an organization",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralization - Past, Present, and Future (2019). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3411897",
   "datePublished": "2019",
   "claim_type": "definitional",
   "confidence": "asserted",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "applies to the author's stipulated working definition of decentralization"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "82f0aea026b3e3a526ec51bc073b3b864dc06cd9083ff9c54c550037045edaa9",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3441904-015",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3441904-015",
   "text": "Curators were the core point of centralization in the original 2016 DAO because the smart contract could not on its own distinguish real from fake proposals, leaving curators with approval and vote prioritization power before any community vote.",
   "abstract": "Because the smart contract on its own could not distinguish real from fake proposals, the curators had approval power and vote prioritization power over contractor proposals before the proposals were put up to a DAO community vote.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Blockchain-Based Corporate Governance (2019). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3441904",
   "datePublished": "2019",
   "claim_type": "mechanism",
   "confidence": "evidenced",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "the original 2016 DAO curator whitelist design"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "e6b562527f7f19accaa35491db0a0db168b6a936755e1dca424e9f30bee7a815",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3652481-001",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3652481-001",
   "text": "Tying a DAO's legal existence to an existing legal and jurisdictional framework typically forces the DAO to appoint a representative in that jurisdiction, and that representative centralizes the DAO, which causes the DAO concept itself to fail.",
   "abstract": "Tying the legal existence of a DAO to any forms of existing legal and jurisdictional frameworks typically results in the need for a representative in the chosen legal framework and jurisdiction, which, in turn, centralizes the DAO and results in the failure of the DAO concept.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations – Internal Governance and External Legal Design (2020). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3652481",
   "datePublished": "2020",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "the chosen jurisdiction requires local legal representation"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "530b3a40c244aeca2eb4c53f4c9b4d6b2962bd6be9f92b4ebe17139c17f4c0e0",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3652481-023",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3652481-023",
   "text": "Existing legal solutions for DAOs typically require some form of legal representation in the relevant jurisdiction, and jurisdictional requirements pertaining to legal representation are always a point of centralization.",
   "abstract": "Existing legal solutions for DAOs typically require forms of legal representation in the respective jurisdiction. Jurisdictional requirements pertaining to legal representation are always a point of centralization.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations – Internal Governance and External Legal Design (2020). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3652481",
   "datePublished": "2020",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "530b3a40c244aeca2eb4c53f4c9b4d6b2962bd6be9f92b4ebe17139c17f4c0e0",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3709041-008",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3709041-008",
   "text": "Decentralization is the antidote to the failures of both socialism and capitalism: centralized coordination of societal and economic activity, in whichever ideological form, should be held to a minimum in order to free human potential and improve society.",
   "abstract": "Decentraliszation posits that centralized coordination of societal and economic activity, as instituted and instantiated in capitalistic or socialistic doctrine, should be held to a minimum in order to free the human potential and improve society.",
   "citation": "Kaal, Blockchain Technology for Good (2020). SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3709041",
   "datePublished": "2020",
   "claim_type": "normative",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "5216a7bca45a48e3bef11ec524936e66af737c0fd66271e9f6866dc20a4482cc",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782191-001",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782191-001",
   "text": "Centralized organization achieves efficiency through hierarchy: hierarchical structures let centrally organized entities allocate resources with minimal energy loss and identify and remove waste in the system.",
   "abstract": "Because of hierarchical structures, centrally organized entities allocate resources with minimal loss of energy and can identify and remove waste in the system.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Preface to (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782191",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "mechanism",
   "confidence": "asserted",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "centrally organized entities with hierarchical structures"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "b0bf0529c3cf69839879bc4da476714efee2717a4beb768bd5c859b810e6174e",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782191-002",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782191-002",
   "text": "Centralized organization of society has reached its limitations, evidenced by weakening public sector legitimacy, economic decline, disillusionment with existing institutions, inadequate response to geopolitical problems, and pressure on overly centralized systems.",
   "abstract": "Other indicators suggest that centralized organization of society has in many ways reached limitations: the general weakening legitimacy of the public sector; increas- ing economic decline; disillusionment with existing business, political, and social in- stitutions",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Preface to (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782191",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "contemporary global economic and political systems"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "b0bf0529c3cf69839879bc4da476714efee2717a4beb768bd5c859b810e6174e",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782191-023",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782191-023",
   "text": "Centralization and decentralization are foundationally different approaches: where centralization creates order, efficiency, and hierarchy out of presumptive chaos, decentralization thrives in perceived chaos, treats inefficiencies as opportunities, and frees the creative process.",
   "abstract": "Centralization and decentralization are foundationally different approaches. Where centralization attempts to make sense of and create order in presumptive chaos, de- centralization thrives in perceived chaos.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Preface to (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782191",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "definitional",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "b0bf0529c3cf69839879bc4da476714efee2717a4beb768bd5c859b810e6174e",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782191-025",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782191-025",
   "text": "Hierarchical centralization is optimally efficient for making big decisions affecting an entire organization, which is why it has historically outcompeted every other organizational structure, whether corporation, army, or government.",
   "abstract": "Hierarchical centralization is optimally efficient for making big decisions that affect the entire organization, and so it has historically outcompeted every other organiza- tional structure, be it corporation or army or government",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Preface to (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782191",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "mechanism",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "decisions affecting an entire organization"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "b0bf0529c3cf69839879bc4da476714efee2717a4beb768bd5c859b810e6174e",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782191-026",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782191-026",
   "text": "Centralization has two major flaws that inevitably lead to its downfall; the first is that every centralized organization has a single point of failure, binding the organization to a leader's poor decisions when that leader lacks information, skill, wisdom, or charisma.",
   "abstract": "Centralization comes with two major flaws that inevi- tably lead to its downfall. First, every centralized organization has a single point of failure.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Preface to (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782191",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "all centralized organizations",
    "aggravated when circumstances change faster than a leader can decide"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "b0bf0529c3cf69839879bc4da476714efee2717a4beb768bd5c859b810e6174e",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782191-030",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782191-030",
   "text": "The most successful organizations choose a hybrid of centralization and decentralization that maximizes the strengths of each rather than occupying either extreme.",
   "abstract": "The most successful organizations choose a hybrid of centralization and decentraliza- tion which maximizes the strengths of each.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Preface to (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782191",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "design",
   "confidence": "asserted",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "b0bf0529c3cf69839879bc4da476714efee2717a4beb768bd5c859b810e6174e",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782191-033",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782191-033",
   "text": "Centralized organizations are more effective and efficient than decentralized ones at the singular task they were designed for, because an optimally centralized structure has no redundancy while decentralization takes longer to locate the right components within its network.",
   "abstract": "Given a specific task, centralized organizations are more effective at the task they are designed for than decentralized organizations.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Preface to (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782191",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "mechanism",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "a specific, predefined task"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "b0bf0529c3cf69839879bc4da476714efee2717a4beb768bd5c859b810e6174e",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782191-036",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782191-036",
   "text": "Centralization is dangerous in any market because monopolies ruin market efficiency by impairing liquidity, while the most efficient and liquid markets have high transaction rates of many goods moving between many small players.",
   "abstract": "In any market, centralization is dangerous. Monopolies ruin the efficiency of a mar- ket—they impair its liquidity.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Preface to (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782191",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "markets"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "b0bf0529c3cf69839879bc4da476714efee2717a4beb768bd5c859b810e6174e",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782192-003",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782192-003",
   "text": "Centralization is an optimal and natural evolutionary solution to most specific organizational problems, but only under static conditions, and competition is the most common driving force that produces a centralized structure.",
   "abstract": "Centralization is an optimal and natural evolutionary solution to most specific organizational problems, under static conditions. Competition is the most common driving force that leads to a centralized structure.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Introduction to Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782192",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "condition",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "static environmental conditions",
    "a specific, well defined organizational problem"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "e7eafd56cb8a8bd15b64cf58216bb655f939bdcc296387e362fd9191976d67ae",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782192-004",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782192-004",
   "text": "Centralization is not the optimal organizational structure under highly dynamic conditions; the very features that make centralized hierarchies efficient become their greatest weaknesses when conditions change.",
   "abstract": "But centralization is not the optimal organizational structure under highly dynamic conditions. The usual strengths of centralized hierarchies become their greatest weaknesses.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Introduction to Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782192",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "highly dynamic or rapidly changing environments"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "e7eafd56cb8a8bd15b64cf58216bb655f939bdcc296387e362fd9191976d67ae",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782192-006",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782192-006",
   "text": "Concentrating too much power in any single office of a hierarchy creates a decision making bottleneck that can cripple the organization, so the tree structure that is optimal for transmitting orders downward is also its point of paralysis.",
   "abstract": "However, if too much power is held in any single office in the hierarchy, de- cision making finds a bottleneck that can cripple the organization.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Introduction to Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782192",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "centralized tree structures with concentrated decision rights"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "e7eafd56cb8a8bd15b64cf58216bb655f939bdcc296387e362fd9191976d67ae",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782192-007",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782192-007",
   "text": "Because information at the edge does not travel up a centralized hierarchy, the central authority makes decisions without full information, and a centralized organization is therefore not well designed to respond to any crisis it has not anticipated.",
   "abstract": "The central authority makes decisions without full information, so a central- ized organization is not well designed to respond to any crisis it hasn't anticipated.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Introduction to Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782192",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "mechanism",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "strongly centralized organizations that leave no decision power at the edges",
    "novel or unanticipated external challenges"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "e7eafd56cb8a8bd15b64cf58216bb655f939bdcc296387e362fd9191976d67ae",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782192-027",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782192-027",
   "text": "Centralization is a natural state that evolves out of decentralization under competition unless it is consciously prevented by guarding members' power, while a centralized organization can always be conquered through its single point of failure at the top.",
   "abstract": "Centralization is a natural state that evolves from decentralization under competition if it is not consciously pre- vented by guarding members' power. It is clear how a centralized organization can be conquered—the single point of failure at the top.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Introduction to Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782192",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "mechanism",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "decentralized organizations exposed to competition"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "e7eafd56cb8a8bd15b64cf58216bb655f939bdcc296387e362fd9191976d67ae",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782193-001",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782193-001",
   "text": "Because more powerful members of a hierarchy are better positioned to capture whatever power becomes available, power distribution in an entrenched hierarchy becomes exponential, leaving the majority with minimal power and wealth. That discontent of the majority is the first destabilizing force acting on a centralized organization.",
   "abstract": "As the hierarchy becomes more entrenched, this exponentially distributed power structure crushes those at the bottom, leaving minimal power and wealth for the vast majority of people. The discontent of the majority is the first destabilizing force of a centralized organization.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Historical Sketches of Centralization vs. Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782193",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "hierarchies that organize through competition",
    "as the hierarchy becomes entrenched over time"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "74df9cc9a19a098bdacd0424a4174795f6e184f7a31c8ee7541195186701ebd2",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782193-002",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782193-002",
   "text": "Rigid hierarchies are unstable and inevitably fall, eroded either by internal corruption or by novel external challenges that the hierarchy is not flexible enough to adapt to. These are the second and third destabilizing factors, alongside majority discontent.",
   "abstract": "Rigid hierarchies are unstable and inevitably fall, eroded from internal corruption or novel external challenges that the hierarchy is not flexible enough to adapt to. These are the second and third factors that explain why centralized organizations are unstable.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Historical Sketches of Centralization vs. Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782193",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "hierarchies whose power relations have become entrenched in secular, codified law"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "74df9cc9a19a098bdacd0424a4174795f6e184f7a31c8ee7541195186701ebd2",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782193-005",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782193-005",
   "text": "Imperial China invented the printing press and applied it to centralize power through uniform edicts and the first printed money; the resulting bureaucratic rigidity left the hierarchy unable to respond to internal corruption and to external invaders.",
   "abstract": "China invented the printing press and used it to centralize power—politically with uniform edicts and economically with the first printed money. Eventually, the hierarchy couldn't re- spond to internal corruption and external threats such as Mongolian, Manchurian, and Western imperial invaders.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Historical Sketches of Centralization vs. Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782193",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "Imperial China's use of printing for political and economic centralization"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "74df9cc9a19a098bdacd0424a4174795f6e184f7a31c8ee7541195186701ebd2",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782193-015",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782193-015",
   "text": "Centralized hierarchies have at best always failed after a few centuries and usually much sooner, and the resulting chaos leaves fertile ground for reorganizing the old order, which is what the cyclical word revolution names.",
   "abstract": "At best, however, the hierar- chy has always failed after a few centuries, usually much sooner, and the resulting chaos leaves fertile ground for reorganizing the old order.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Historical Sketches of Centralization vs. Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782193",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "rigid centralized hierarchies viewed on a historical timescale"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "74df9cc9a19a098bdacd0424a4174795f6e184f7a31c8ee7541195186701ebd2",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782193-016",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782193-016",
   "text": "Centralization is a powerful mechanism for rapidly building an efficient organization aimed at solving one specific problem, such as war in pre-unified China.",
   "abstract": "Centralization is a powerful mechanism for rapidly building an effi- cient organization for solving a specific problem (e.g., war in pre-unified China).",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Historical Sketches of Centralization vs. Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782193",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "mechanism",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "organizations built around a single, well-defined problem"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "74df9cc9a19a098bdacd0424a4174795f6e184f7a31c8ee7541195186701ebd2",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782193-017",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782193-017",
   "text": "The more effective a centralized architecture becomes at solving its target problem, the more rigid and unforgiving it becomes; rigid architectures are unstable and fail when met with novel challenges, so more decentralized organizations are more stable.",
   "abstract": "But rigid architectures are unstable and fail when met with novel challenges. More de- centralized organizations are more stable.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Historical Sketches of Centralization vs. Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782193",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "when the organization encounters challenges different from the one it was designed for"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "74df9cc9a19a098bdacd0424a4174795f6e184f7a31c8ee7541195186701ebd2",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782193-025",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782193-025",
   "text": "Giving the Apaches cattle in 1917 succeeded where military force had failed because the valuable assets created a zero-sum battle over resources between lineages, generating the internal competition necessary to produce a hierarchy of power over the disbursement of resources and property.",
   "abstract": "As Nevins explained, the introduction of the cattle created \"a zero-sum battle over resources between lineages\".26 The valuable assets created the internal competition necessary to generate a hierarchy of power over disbursement of resources and property.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Historical Sketches of Centralization vs. Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782193",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "mechanism",
   "confidence": "evidenced",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "introduction of divisible valuable assets into a decentralized group"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "74df9cc9a19a098bdacd0424a4174795f6e184f7a31c8ee7541195186701ebd2",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782193-026",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782193-026",
   "text": "The authors accept Brafman and Beckstrom's thesis that the best way to convert a decentralized organization into a centralized one is to introduce the profit motive, since money supplies a focal point for internal competition.",
   "abstract": "The thesis of The Starfish and the Spider is that the best way to convert a decentral- ized organization to a centralized organization is to introduce the profit motive.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Historical Sketches of Centralization vs. Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782193",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "mechanism",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "decentralized organizations in which profits become available to members"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "74df9cc9a19a098bdacd0424a4174795f6e184f7a31c8ee7541195186701ebd2",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782193-027",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782193-027",
   "text": "Bitcoin does not refute the thesis that money centralizes decentralized projects: hashing power has slowly become concentrated in mining pools until the majority of that power resides in the single country of China.",
   "abstract": "Slowly, Bitcoin hashing power has become more concentrated in mining pools, until today the ma- jority of power resides in the single country of China.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Historical Sketches of Centralization vs. Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782193",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "empirical",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "Bitcoin after roughly ten years of operation, as of the authors' writing"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "74df9cc9a19a098bdacd0424a4174795f6e184f7a31c8ee7541195186701ebd2",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782193-028",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782193-028",
   "text": "Almost every blockchain project the authors are aware of is suffering under the centralizing force of competition for equity control and profit, and such projects predictably move toward centralization when unconscious of these forces.",
   "abstract": "In fact, almost every blockchain project we're aware of is suffering under the central- izing force of competition for equity control and profit.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Historical Sketches of Centralization vs. Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782193",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "empirical",
   "confidence": "asserted",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "contemporary for-profit blockchain and Web3 projects"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "74df9cc9a19a098bdacd0424a4174795f6e184f7a31c8ee7541195186701ebd2",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782193-038",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782193-038",
   "text": "When the executive branch is given more centralizing power during a crisis, or simply takes it, the mechanism for removing that power once the threat has passed has rarely been followed.",
   "abstract": "When the executive branch is given more centralizing power during a crisis, or simply takes it, the mechanism for removing that power when the threat is over has rarely been followed.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Historical Sketches of Centralization vs. Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782193",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "crisis conditions such as war",
    "U.S. constitutional practice"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "74df9cc9a19a098bdacd0424a4174795f6e184f7a31c8ee7541195186701ebd2",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782198-021",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782198-021",
   "text": "Earlier centralized companies defeated more decentralized peer to peer platforms because of the technology of the time and the incentive design built into capitalist civilization: consumer devices could not match industrial upload speeds, centralized firms had the incentive to polish user interfaces, and economies of scale made central bureaucracy worth negotiating.",
   "abstract": "The reason earlier centralized companies succeeded against more decentralized P)P platforms is due to the existing technology of the time and the natural incentive design that is built into our capitalist civilization.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Contemporary Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782198",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "mechanism",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "describes the competitive conditions of the early internet era"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "e7e1378e3eed06cace6534e7792a7307d607d18bc6beb4ac45896476280728e4",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782201-011",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782201-011",
   "text": "Centralized and opaque reputation systems such as China's Social Credit System are unstable in the long run and particularly dangerous, because their computerized bureaucracy makes them inherently rigid and their early successes make them progressively more brittle.",
   "abstract": "Centralized and opaque systems like the SCS are unstable in the long run. They are particularly dangerous, because their computerized bureaucracy makes them in- herently rigid. Their early successes will make them more and more brittle.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Future of Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782201",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "centralized and opaque systems administered by computerized bureaucracy"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "bedf7bcfbb7a9b0112b5848cb0d941b1d41f330dafeee0143a30ff5e8aa53700",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782205-012",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782205-012",
   "text": "Historically, whenever a healthy decentralized organization began to earn money it quickly devolved into a centralized institution, because its uniting ideals shifted from transcendental value to a desire for money.",
   "abstract": "Whenever a healthy decentralized organization in the past began to earn money, it quickly devolved to a centralized institution. Their ideals shifted from the transcen- dental value which originally united them to a desire for money.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Eight Institutions for the Evolution of Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782205",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "historical decentralized organizations that became profitable"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "5ba52c63e81019b6867fb29c4a50821ff574e510d79b31b8ce9f4c726a0ebc71",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782205-013",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782205-013",
   "text": "Once the equalizing ideal that moderates a decentralized organization is lost, competition generated by the profit motive leads inevitably to centralization with rigid rules about who holds power and wealth.",
   "abstract": "Without the previous equalizing ideal to moderate, the competition generated by the profit motive led in- evitably to the organization centralizing with rigid rules for who has power and wealth.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Eight Institutions for the Evolution of Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782205",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "mechanism",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "organizations lacking a moderating shared ideal"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "5ba52c63e81019b6867fb29c4a50821ff574e510d79b31b8ce9f4c726a0ebc71",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782214-004",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782214-004",
   "text": "Benevolent dictatorship is more efficient and effective than messy democracy in the short run, but centralized governance of that kind threatens the long term stability of a powerful public peer to peer network.",
   "abstract": "Benevolent dictators are much more efficient and effective than messy democracies, but the long-term stability of a powerful public PCP network is threatened by such centralized governance.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Governance (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782214",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "large public peer to peer networks",
    "long time horizons"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "ba892bb200c1455447c0014f5067a501a93ea9ec413c31942d95952eb3bdfd9d",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782214-018",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782214-018",
   "text": "Internal competition for profit creates a natural tendency to centralize power as members differentiate themselves through wins and losses, and this centralizing tendency is an additional destabilizing force on a decentralized organization.",
   "abstract": "The internal competition for profit creates the natural tendency to centralize power as the members differentiate themselves with wins and losses. This centralizing tendency is another force further destabilizing the organizations.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Governance (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782214",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "mechanism",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "for profit organizations with internal competition"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "ba892bb200c1455447c0014f5067a501a93ea9ec413c31942d95952eb3bdfd9d",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782217-004",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782217-004",
   "text": "Any reliance by a DAO on a centralized feature creates a centralized point of failure that threatens the survival of the organization and renders the system technically centralized despite its decentralized appearance.",
   "abstract": "Any time your DAO relies on a centralized feature, that is a centralized point of failure that is a threat to the survival of the organization. That means the system is technically centralized.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, The Importance of History In Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782217",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "DAOs with any centralized dependency, including oracles"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "358779557d8e7dcd101720ca0fad90b9146d24f1c7c03909eb431fcf1fb7e103",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782217-005",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782217-005",
   "text": "Where a DAO is automated around a single centralized point of failure, the work of decentralizing and giving members redundant power is wasted, because the point of failure functions as a supreme leader and full centralization would be more efficient.",
   "abstract": "In that case it would be more efficient to completely centralize around the single point of failure the DAO is automated around. The effort you're making to decentralize and give each member redundant power is wasted, because the point of failure might as well be the supreme leader.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, The Importance of History In Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782217",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "DAO automated around one centralized component"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "358779557d8e7dcd101720ca0fad90b9146d24f1c7c03909eb431fcf1fb7e103",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782220-002",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782220-002",
   "text": "Because a single global society is emerging in which everyone is densely interconnected, the more efficient and stable arrangement is power decentralization giving individuals and subgroup DAOs autonomous power, not a single power-centralized hierarchy controlling the whole.",
   "abstract": "the better, more efficient, more stable state of this global society is an organi- zation that is power decentralized, giving individuals and subgroup DAOs more auton- omous power to contribute to the health and wealth and happiness of all.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, The Importance of Transcendental Unifying Values for Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782220",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "design",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "globally interconnected society"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "f0bf1e80c6da60a6f8ba20630562bdf1dab171ccb5267f497dc0b815113cde99",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782220-027",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782220-027",
   "text": "A long-term successful network requires a dynamic and responsive governance system that keeps the organization in the decentralized democratic realm and prevents it from moving to the next natural stage of centralized governance with a static hierarchy.",
   "abstract": "A long-term successful network requires a dynamic and responsive system of gov- ernance to keep the organization in the decentralized, democratic realm, and prevents it from moving to the next natural stage of centralized governance with a static hier- archy.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, The Importance of Transcendental Unifying Values for Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782220",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "condition",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "long-term network survival"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "f0bf1e80c6da60a6f8ba20630562bdf1dab171ccb5267f497dc0b815113cde99",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782220-028",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782220-028",
   "text": "The drift into static power relationships is a universal temptation because centralization is efficient, yet centralized governance is provably flawed.",
   "abstract": "we must protect the group from falling into static power rela- tionships. The temptation is universal, because of the efficiency of centralization, but it is provably flawed.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, The Importance of Transcendental Unifying Values for Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782220",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "organizations facing the choice between centralized and decentralized governance"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "f0bf1e80c6da60a6f8ba20630562bdf1dab171ccb5267f497dc0b815113cde99",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782220-030",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782220-030",
   "text": "A centralized hierarchy becomes too rigid when those policing the rules gain more power than the members who honor the transcendental value that originally founded the organization, and the spirit of the law should always reign above the letter of the law.",
   "abstract": "A centralized hierarchy becomes too rigid when those policing the rules gain more power than the members who are honoring the transcendental value that originally founded the organization. The spirit of the law should always reign above the letter of the law.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, The Importance of Transcendental Unifying Values for Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782220",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "centralized hierarchies with rule enforcement roles"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "f0bf1e80c6da60a6f8ba20630562bdf1dab171ccb5267f497dc0b815113cde99",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782220-039",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782220-039",
   "text": "Decentralized organizations demand more from their members and return more autonomous power and profit, whereas centralized organizations shelter members in a niche and limit and stultify their power in exchange for security.",
   "abstract": "Decentralized organizations demand more from their members and return more, in autonomous power and profit. Centralized organizations shelter their members within a niche in a hierarchy. Centralized organizations limit the power of their mem- bers, stultifying them,",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, The Importance of Transcendental Unifying Values for Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782220",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "mechanism",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "f0bf1e80c6da60a6f8ba20630562bdf1dab171ccb5267f497dc0b815113cde99",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3799320-001",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3799320-001",
   "text": "The concept of a DAO fails if it becomes centralized, and centralization in governance is the largest single threat to a DAO.",
   "abstract": "The concept of a DAO fails if it becomes centralized. Centralization is omnipresent in computing systems, economics, and society at large. Yet centralization in governance is perhaps the largest threat to a DAO.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, A Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) of DAOs (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3799320",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "c3dff852f2d3f04718c829a24189309a7db4d92d84f6045d3d4f562d87c03e63",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3799320-017",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3799320-017",
   "text": "Existing legal solutions for DAOs typically require some form of legal representation in the relevant jurisdiction, and such representation is always a point of centralization.",
   "abstract": "Existing legal solutions for DAOs typically require forms of legal representation in the respective jurisdiction, which are always a point of centralization.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, A Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) of DAOs (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3799320",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "current legal wrappers available to DAOs"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "c3dff852f2d3f04718c829a24189309a7db4d92d84f6045d3d4f562d87c03e63",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3808859-026",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3808859-026",
   "text": "Open source communities are not immune to centralization, because humans have a natural inclination to convert knowledge and resources into power over others, which is why projects such as Apache developed multiple ranked developer tiers with unequal voting rights.",
   "abstract": "The open source development community is not immune to centralization. Humans have a natural inclination to use knowledge and resources to exert power over others.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralization – Why We Need Technology Infrastructure Upgrades (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3808859",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "304ad25d43b5ecea3158e3a2ca04e6e1e3bd2958e2134e2dcefbfedf3b6f3ab7",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3808867-005",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3808867-005",
   "text": "Decentralism transcends both socialism and capitalism by positing that centralized coordination of societal and economic activity, in whichever doctrinal form, should be minimized in order to free human potential.",
   "abstract": "Decentralism transcends socialism and capitalism. Decentralism posits that centralized coordination of societal and economic activity, as instituted and instantiated in capitalistic or socialistic doctrine, should be held to a minimum in order to free the human potential.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, How Decentralized Systems Can Upgrade AI (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3808867",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "definitional",
   "confidence": "asserted",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "eeccf6d0587bd278a96ce6ac8ec5003e26d161c245f6c94b4144d84f374802eb",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3808873-008",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3808873-008",
   "text": "Proof of Work block rewards structurally reintroduce centralization: the economic nature of mining rewards incentivizes degrees of centralization through collective action of nodes that share rewards as a group, that is, mining pools.",
   "abstract": "The economic nature of these rewards incentivizes degrees of centralization in collective action of nodes that share in the mining rewards as a group, so called mining pools.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralization Neutralizers (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3808873",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "mechanism",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "Proof of Work consensus with block rewards",
    "Bitcoin in the early 2020s"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "f11493915e6b8c266d421510b5546816e33defb5650aac9d09b20d78549da727",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3808873-010",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3808873-010",
   "text": "The decentralization of network technology is capped by its host environment: decentralized systems are built on and confined by the internet, which is decentralized in its foundation but has a centralized order structure.",
   "abstract": "The decentralization of network technology is limited because it operates in an environment of centralized technology. The internet, while in its foundation decentralized, has a centralized order structure.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralization Neutralizers (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3808873",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "mechanism",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "decentralized systems built on existing internet infrastructure"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "f11493915e6b8c266d421510b5546816e33defb5650aac9d09b20d78549da727",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3808873-011",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3808873-011",
   "text": "Centralization follows an S curve: in the expansion phase the benefits of centralizing power, capital and control rise faster than its costs, but in the decline phase the rising costs of centralization, including corruption, diseconomies of scale and cronyism, can no longer be offset, so centralized systems function less optimally and less efficiently.",
   "abstract": "Because of the increase in the cost of centralization, the benefits of centralization can no longer offset and outweigh the cost. As a result, centralized systems function less optimally and less efficiently.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralization Neutralizers (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3808873",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "mechanism",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "centralized systems in business and society over their life cycle"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "f11493915e6b8c266d421510b5546816e33defb5650aac9d09b20d78549da727",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3808873-015",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3808873-015",
   "text": "Unintentional methodologically centralized design features in complex decentralized systems are inevitable, because human brains naturally simplify complex systems for the sake of coherence and designers therefore reach for centralized features that increase coherence.",
   "abstract": "Unintentional methodologically centralized design features in complex decentralized systems are inevitable.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralization Neutralizers (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3808873",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "mechanism",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "complex adaptive decentralized systems designed by humans"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "f11493915e6b8c266d421510b5546816e33defb5650aac9d09b20d78549da727",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3931933-013",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3931933-013",
   "text": "The initial Casper testnet was subject to inevitable centralization, illustrated by a small group of core developers setting validator performance numbers and other rules without broader community input.",
   "abstract": "The initial Casper testnet was subject to inevitable forms of centralization. For example, a small group of core developers determined the testnet validator performance numbers and other rules without broader community input. Moreover, only a rather small group of developers managed",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Hybrid Secure Proof of Stake (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3931933",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "initial Casper testnet governance"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "55a71cdfceb96fadefba1f2fed9563b588825378c91aff644ee7faaccdf31204",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3936876-040",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3936876-040",
   "text": "Delegation of rights to custody providers is only an incremental step toward centralization via delegation to third party investment managers, and it opens a floodgate because each additional level of investment discretion over digital assets exacerbates centralization concerns and compounds rent seeking suboptimalities.",
   "abstract": "This becomes a floodgate issue, as each level of investment discretion over digital assets exacerbates the centralization concerns and compounds the rent seeking suboptimalities.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Hayley Howe, Custody of Digital Assets (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3936876",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "delegation chains that begin with custody and extend to discretionary management"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "9bc0903d01910460298e754c451f027df4324367359800a98ee8e638d94aff55",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3981021-005",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3981021-005",
   "text": "Modern philanthropic strategies entrust donors with identifying which problems need to be solved and with providing the solutions, rather than trusting the solutions proposed by the nonprofits themselves, which makes the approach more centralized and less grassroots.",
   "abstract": "strategies that entrust donors with identifying which problems need to be solved and then provide the perceived appropriate solutions; rather than trusting the solutions proposed by the non-profits themselves.38 This approach is more centralized and less grassroots39 for solving societal issues.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, How Decentralized Autonomous Organizations Optimize Charitable Giving (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3981021",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "mechanism",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "modern donor driven philanthropic strategies"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "9d8bc78d119c780c96c89ce3e820f4ac8b037d39b3ade59feb4e40d46b048288",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4015908-003",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:4015908-003",
   "text": "The foundation model for token issuance is a core form of centralized top-down governance, and most ICO projects were governed by a small group of individuals rather than by the community at large or a DAO.",
   "abstract": "The foundation model for token issuance is a core form of centralized top-down governance in the context of token offerings.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Fair Token Launch (2022). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4015908",
   "datePublished": "2022",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "asserted",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "ICO era token issuance"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "e0925afde0c42a16cd5310983789fae3eb3d1f121e2954a72afa64191d00fe37",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4015908-028",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:4015908-028",
   "text": "Whale purchases that soak up token supply at the earliest possible time in a launch are the key problem fair launch platforms address, because they can be the origin of significant centralization that harms the project for the entirety of its active market engagement.",
   "abstract": "of whale token purchases that soak up supply at the earliest possible time in the token launch. Such whale purchases can be the origin of significant centralization of a token launch that may harm the project for the entirely of its active market engagement.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Fair Token Launch (2022). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4015908",
   "datePublished": "2022",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "whales able to buy large amounts at the earliest moment of a launch"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "e0925afde0c42a16cd5310983789fae3eb3d1f121e2954a72afa64191d00fe37",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4015908-033",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:4015908-033",
   "text": "If the top 10 addresses own a disproportionally large supply of a token, the project or community becomes more centralized, an outcome fair launches seek to avoid.",
   "abstract": "If the top 10 addresses own a disproportionally large supply of a token, then the project or community becomes more centralized; an outcome which fair launches seek to avoid.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Fair Token Launch (2022). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4015908",
   "datePublished": "2022",
   "claim_type": "condition",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "token supply concentration measured across top holder addresses"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "e0925afde0c42a16cd5310983789fae3eb3d1f121e2954a72afa64191d00fe37",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4015908-038",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:4015908-038",
   "text": "Non-linear reward structures using weighting, tiers, or logarithmic curves counteract centralization of token supply by decentralizing disproportionate returns so that rewards do not scale linearly with the amount of liquidity a user holds.",
   "abstract": "Fair launch protocols can create some form of weighting, tier, and/or logarithmic curves for rewards. This decentralizes disproportionate returns, so they do not scale linearly with the amount user liquidity a user has.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Fair Token Launch (2022). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4015908",
   "datePublished": "2022",
   "claim_type": "design",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "fair launch protocol designing its reward structure"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "e0925afde0c42a16cd5310983789fae3eb3d1f121e2954a72afa64191d00fe37",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4067783-002",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:4067783-002",
   "text": "Poorly executed DAOs exhibit a recognizable cluster of pathologies, including siphoned coins, distracted and robo voters, centralization, DAO washing by founders, and absent decentralized governance, and these pathologies drive mid-term and long-term DAO failure.",
   "abstract": "Several of the identifiable downsides include: siphoned coins, distracted and robo voters, centralization, DAO washing by founders, lack of decentralized governance, and other pitfalls that could end up in mid-term and long-term DAO failure.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, DAO Fallacies (2022). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4067783",
   "datePublished": "2022",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "asserted",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "48f1e307cdbbe28c7843f7744d0ba8cf01662f257a53f2066a7a6c7e03a5acec",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4067783-030",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:4067783-030",
   "text": "Traditional work in centralized structures is prone to extrinsically motivated engagement, which intensifies principal agent problems and produces suboptimal outcomes because a principal dictates where, what, and when workers perform.",
   "abstract": "The traditional work environment in centralized structures is prone to extrinsically motivated work engagement which intensifies principal agent problems.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, DAO Fallacies (2022). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4067783",
   "datePublished": "2022",
   "claim_type": "mechanism",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "centralized employment structures with a directing principal"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "48f1e307cdbbe28c7843f7744d0ba8cf01662f257a53f2066a7a6c7e03a5acec",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4067783-037",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:4067783-037",
   "text": "Centralization and monopolies are a threat to market liquidity because they can carry too much mass or too much velocity, and an imbalance in either direction, too much mass and too little velocity or too little mass, damages the market.",
   "abstract": "When there is too much mass and not enough velocity, it can gunk up the engine - when there is too little mass in the market, it can be cleared too quickly. Centralization and monopolies are a threat to market liquidity as they can have too much mass or too much velocity.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, DAO Fallacies (2022). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4067783",
   "datePublished": "2022",
   "claim_type": "mechanism",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "48f1e307cdbbe28c7843f7744d0ba8cf01662f257a53f2066a7a6c7e03a5acec",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4067783-039",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:4067783-039",
   "text": "Diversity of viewpoints is severely diminished when power is centralized, whereas information technology allows a global network open to members of diverse values and backgrounds to form.",
   "abstract": "Diversity of viewpoints is severely diminished when power is centralized. Information technology allows a global network of people to form, open to members of diverse values and backgrounds.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, DAO Fallacies (2022). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4067783",
   "datePublished": "2022",
   "claim_type": "mechanism",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "48f1e307cdbbe28c7843f7744d0ba8cf01662f257a53f2066a7a6c7e03a5acec",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4529715-015",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:4529715-015",
   "text": "The most significant risk of bad DAO governance is centralization, in which a small group holds a disproportionate share of power or influence and thereby undermines the decentralized nature of the organization.",
   "abstract": "centralization, where a small group of individuals or entities hold a disproportionate amount of power or influence within the DAO, which can undermine the decentralized nature of the organization.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Josh Bykowski, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAO) – A Market Meta Analysis (2023). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4529715",
   "datePublished": "2023",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "2d71961e8c449afbeaf45ca4f53de8a575d45c77d6960b767d3d1d0874f296b5",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4529715-023",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:4529715-023",
   "text": "Blockchains cannot access off-chain data, and resolving this by using centralized oracles nullifies the advantages of decentralized systems while creating major security risks such as bribing and intimidation.",
   "abstract": "There is something known as the oracle problem, which is the fact that blockchains themselves can't access off-chain data. Using centralized oracles nullifies the advantages of decentralized systems, and are major security risks (such as bribing, intimidation, etc.)",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Josh Bykowski, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAO) – A Market Meta Analysis (2023). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4529715",
   "datePublished": "2023",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "oracle dependent smart contracts"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "2d71961e8c449afbeaf45ca4f53de8a575d45c77d6960b767d3d1d0874f296b5",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4685567-017",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:4685567-017",
   "text": "The impact measurement consulting business follows a distinctly centralized approach, and without the crowd wisdom and community audit that WEB3 Impact 3.0 supplies, such consulting practices are subject to single points of failure.",
   "abstract": "Without crowd wisdom and community audit that are part of WEB3 Impact 3.0, such consulting practices can often be subject to single points of failure.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Impact Investing Innovation - From Impact 1.0 to 3.0 (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4685567",
   "datePublished": "2024",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "centralized consulting model for impact measurement"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "87fb1be89d2661967ed2b0b673fe26448ded3bc3119b122177a4fc13ae5c085c",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4734750-016",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:4734750-016",
   "text": "It is ironic that some of the strongest forms of exploitation and centralized economies of scale have been created inside the code review market, which exists to support the decentralization of other industries.",
   "abstract": "it is a bit ironic that one of the strongest forms of exploitation and centralized economies of scale are being created in a market that is, from the outset, supposed to help support the decentralization of disparate industries",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Code Review DAO (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4734750",
   "datePublished": "2024",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "60eadf91c0913468505afc664c8d8d1e1673d6c5326d031ca7060addb8ab2eda",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4734750-017",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:4734750-017",
   "text": "Centralization of the code review industry causes systematic overpricing, because clients will pay nearly any price to obtain the approval stamp of one of the top five audit firms.",
   "abstract": "As a result of the centralization of the industry, most code reviews are significantly overpriced. Clients pretty much pay any price to get the stamp of approval from one of the top 5 audit firms.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Code Review DAO (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4734750",
   "datePublished": "2024",
   "claim_type": "mechanism",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "60eadf91c0913468505afc664c8d8d1e1673d6c5326d031ca7060addb8ab2eda",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4734750-018",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:4734750-018",
   "text": "Centralized market power blocks other industry players from establishing internal or external controls on code review quality, so the public has no or very weak control over the quality of the review services it receives.",
   "abstract": "The centralized power also undermines attempts by other industry players to create internal or external controls on the quality of code reviews. As a result, the public has no or very weak control over the quality of code review services it receives.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Code Review DAO (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4734750",
   "datePublished": "2024",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "60eadf91c0913468505afc664c8d8d1e1673d6c5326d031ca7060addb8ab2eda",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4734750-019",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:4734750-019",
   "text": "Because job posters cannot afford to shop for better priced reviews and must buy market acceptance, centralization of the code review market eliminates any form of downward price pressure.",
   "abstract": "In turn, the centralization of the market undermines any form of downward price pressure.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Code Review DAO (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4734750",
   "datePublished": "2024",
   "claim_type": "mechanism",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "60eadf91c0913468505afc664c8d8d1e1673d6c5326d031ca7060addb8ab2eda",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4796714-028",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:4796714-028",
   "text": "Privacy preserving frameworks such as federated learning do not fully remove centralization, because they still typically depend on a central client to collect and distribute model information, which reintroduces high communication loads and centralized vulnerabilities.",
   "abstract": "In response, privacy-preserving frameworks like federated learning have been developed, yet these often still depend on a central client to collect and distribute model information, resulting in high communication loads and centralized vulnerabilities.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, AI Governance (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4796714",
   "datePublished": "2024",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "evidenced",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "applies to standard federated learning architectures with a central aggregator"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "59fa63bae179e8f9b6b8efbdf90cee28400276512a1b04f9f579a48641305c93",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4941807-020",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:4941807-020",
   "text": "Privacy preserving frameworks such as federated learning do not fully solve centralization, because they typically still depend on a central client to collect and distribute model information, which produces high communication loads and reintroduces centralized vulnerabilities.",
   "abstract": "In response, privacy-preserving frameworks like federated learning have been developed, yet these often still depend on a central client to collect and distribute model information, resulting in high communication loads and centralized vulnerabilities.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, AI Governance Via Web3 Reputation System (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4941807",
   "datePublished": "2024",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "in federated learning designs that retain a central aggregating client"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "ab66c1e99a88da1fa36b0c6b536df5184231fe6aa427f3dd53287a4e0ac79853",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5254152-005",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:5254152-005",
   "text": "Poorly governed DAOs face significant risks of centralization, lack of transparency, and inefficiency, so effective governance structures are a precondition for DAO sustainability.",
   "abstract": "However, poorly governed DAOs face significant risks, including centralization, lack of transparency, and inefficiency.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, DAO Market Meta Analysis 2024 (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5254152",
   "datePublished": "2024",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "DAOs without effective governance structures"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "bb2052d809a4615f0f3e2526ba6416293c40d00260149ba4fe6f38addf052796",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5254152-027",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:5254152-027",
   "text": "Requiring users to purchase governance tokens in order to vote both centralizes power in majority token holders and leaves the DAO highly vulnerable to 51 percent and sock puppet attacks, as illustrated by Gelato DAO which scored 1 on both decentralization and attack resistance.",
   "abstract": "It is highly centralized as users must purchase governance tokens to vote, limiting power to majority token holders (D: 1). The platform is highly vulnerable to 51% and sock puppet attacks due to the purchasable governance tokens (A: 1).",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, DAO Market Meta Analysis 2024 (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5254152",
   "datePublished": "2024",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "evidenced",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "DAOs where voting requires purchasing fungible governance tokens"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "bb2052d809a4615f0f3e2526ba6416293c40d00260149ba4fe6f38addf052796",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5254152-036",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:5254152-036",
   "text": "A governance design aimed at democratic balance can still centralize power over time when the token supply is fixed, as recorded for MoonDAO.",
   "abstract": "aims for democratic balance but the fixed token supply could result in centralized power over time (G: 4)",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, DAO Market Meta Analysis 2024 (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5254152",
   "datePublished": "2024",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "evidenced",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "DAOs with a fixed governance token supply"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "bb2052d809a4615f0f3e2526ba6416293c40d00260149ba4fe6f38addf052796",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5254152-037",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:5254152-037",
   "text": "Tiered membership models that tie governance rights and influence to token holdings introduce imbalance and a centralization element into DAO governance, as scored for Bankless DAO.",
   "abstract": "The tiered membership model ties rights and influence to token holdings, creating an imbalance and centralization element in its governance (G: 4).",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, DAO Market Meta Analysis 2024 (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5254152",
   "datePublished": "2024",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "evidenced",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "DAOs with contributor tiers or access levels keyed to token ownership"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "bb2052d809a4615f0f3e2526ba6416293c40d00260149ba4fe6f38addf052796",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5225296-008",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:5225296-008",
   "text": "SPoS avoids the delegate centralization of DPoS, where block production concentrates among a small elected set, by distributing block production opportunities across validators in proportion to both reputation and stake.",
   "abstract": "Unlike DPoS, which centralizes block production among a small set of delegates (e.g., 21 in EOS), SPoS balances fairness and randomness by distributing opportunities across validators proportionally to their reputation and stake",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Cryptographic Foundations and Interdisciplinary Dimensions of the Secure Proof of Stake (SPoS) Conse (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5225296",
   "datePublished": "2025",
   "claim_type": "mechanism",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "contrast with DPoS implementations such as EOS with 21 delegates"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "b2fec675d906334ad67e13b2d97261dc31e38061022867eb3f9ceadd95f4878d",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/6192998-002",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:6192998-002",
   "text": "Solving the identity problem through centralized control fails on its own terms: it reintroduces rent seeking intermediaries who extract value, censor participants, and create single points of failure, which is precisely what decentralized systems exist to eliminate.",
   "abstract": "Second, the centralization problem: Platforms that solve the identity problem through centralized control8 introduce rent-seeking intermediaries who extract value, censor participants, and create single points of failure.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Evolution of Domain-Specific Reputation Systems From Binary Validation to Citation-Weighted Knowledge Attribution (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6192998",
   "datePublished": "2026",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "platforms that impose centralized identity or rating control"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "b04292561ee041e0c9eaa7eca28a410ed440e76a95743a539361a3f76c97f2b3",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/6244278-034",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:6244278-034",
   "text": "Centralized AI systems excel at scaling defined work but struggle to cultivate genuine discernment without consequential feedback, and they face escalating constraints in data scarcity, energy demands, regulatory scrutiny, and interconnect bottlenecks.",
   "abstract": "Centralized systems excel at scaling defined work but struggle to cultivate genuine discernment without consequential feedback.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, AI's Mother's Instinct Engineered Consequence Emergent Ethics and the Institutional Trajectory Toward Agentic Alignment (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6244278",
   "datePublished": "2026",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "applies to purely centralized approaches to artificial general intelligence"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "53533cdcc081184e7a376516ad4fece0a64ce49f6c8931b6a2c2e98ed914a84b",
   "status": "current"
  }
 ],
 "description": "90 claims in the published works of Wulf A. Kaal carry the concept tag 'centralization'. Derived node: a roster, not an adjudicated definition."
}