{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "DefinedTerm",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/client-recourse",
 "identifier": "kaal:entity:client-recourse",
 "name": "Client recourse",
 "termCode": "client-recourse",
 "inDefinedTermSet": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/index.json"
 },
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0757-275X"
 },
 "dateModified": "2026-07-29",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/client-recourse.md",
 "sha256": "fe81dedc9a932961d5e3ffc7c34e55bd7d0b284a1464e3d341f1e0df951ee0e1",
 "additionalProperty": [
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "status",
   "value": "derived"
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "claim_count",
   "value": 2
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "work_count",
   "value": 2
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "year_span",
   "value": [
    "2021",
    "2024"
   ]
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "non_current_claims",
   "value": 0
  }
 ],
 "subjectOf": [
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3995709-023",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3995709-023",
   "text": "There is little or no recourse for clients when reviewed code proves to be flawed even after functionality and quality review.",
   "abstract": "Moreover, there is little or no recourse for clients in cases in which the code proved to be flawed even after functionality and quality review.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, How DAOs Optimize Open-Source Code Reviews and Create Open-Source Standards (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3995709",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "asserted",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "the existing code review and audit market"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "6d77dbfb15ee86080bfde0b98089180cabafeb6defdf0f05eaaeb3cb99871e89",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4755632-026",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:4755632-026",
   "text": "Because a limited number of players control the code review market and its outputs, the quality of code review is often suboptimal, and clients have little or no recourse when code proves flawed even after functionality and quality review.",
   "abstract": "Moreover, there is little or no recourse for clients in cases in which the code proved to be flawed even after functionality and quality review.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, AI Learning - Decentralized Governance to Optimize Human Output Datasets for AI Learning (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4755632",
   "datePublished": "2024",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "applies to the centralized code review market"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "972ccebf0c06ac1767a9e443bb95942b7670e806a63c25ee817c368a64c8eca8",
   "status": "current"
  }
 ],
 "description": "2 claims in the published works of Wulf A. Kaal carry the concept tag 'client-recourse'. Derived node: a roster, not an adjudicated definition."
}