# Client recourse `kaal:entity:client-recourse` **Status.** derived This node is assembled mechanically from the 2 claims that carry the concept tag `client-recourse`. It is a roster of what the corpus says under this term. It is **not** an adjudicated definition: no single statement here has been ruled canonical, and no first-appearance call has been made. Read the claims and judge for yourself. ## Every claim under this term 2 claims across 2 works, 2021 to 2024. **2021** - [3995709-023](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3995709-023) [failure/asserted] *(failure mode)* -- There is little or no recourse for clients when reviewed code proves to be flawed even after functionality and quality review. > Moreover, there is little or no recourse for clients in cases in which the code proved to be flawed even after functionality and quality review. Wulf A. Kaal, How DAOs Optimize Open-Source Code Reviews and Create Open-Source Standards (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3995709 **2024** - [4755632-026](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4755632-026) [failure/argued] *(failure mode)* -- Because a limited number of players control the code review market and its outputs, the quality of code review is often suboptimal, and clients have little or no recourse when code proves flawed even after functionality and quality review. > Moreover, there is little or no recourse for clients in cases in which the code proved to be flawed even after functionality and quality review. Wulf A. Kaal, AI Learning - Decentralized Governance to Optimize Human Output Datasets for AI Learning (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4755632 ## Verify Every claim above resolves to a record carrying a verbatim source quote, the sha256 of the source PDF, and a preformatted citation. Nothing here asks to be taken on trust. curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/client-recourse.md | sha256sum **Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of this entity node. Its sha256 is the content hash.