{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "DefinedTerm",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/coffee-proposal",
 "identifier": "kaal:entity:coffee-proposal",
 "name": "Coffee proposal",
 "termCode": "coffee-proposal",
 "inDefinedTermSet": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/index.json"
 },
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0757-275X"
 },
 "dateModified": "2026-07-29",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/coffee-proposal.md",
 "sha256": "7747504b6388ea1b8100724ce3c740021e710171535884bb77511033f28e32ac",
 "additionalProperty": [
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "status",
   "value": "derived"
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "claim_count",
   "value": 2
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "work_count",
   "value": 1
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "year_span",
   "value": [
    "2011",
    "2011"
   ]
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "non_current_claims",
   "value": 0
  }
 ],
 "subjectOf": [
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1908473-024",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:1908473-024",
   "text": "Departing from Coffee's design, super-voting rights should be allocated to contingent capital holders only if the first trigger failed to improve the institution's financial health; at the first trigger the new shareholder gets one vote per share.",
   "abstract": "Although we agree with the need for increased voting rights, the proposal in this Article would allocate super-voting rights to CCS holders only if the first trigger did not result in an improvement of the financial institution's financial health.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Christoph Henkel, Contingent Capital with Sequential Triggers (2011). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1908473",
   "datePublished": "2011",
   "claim_type": "design",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "Voting rights escalate only on a continuing downward trend after the first conversion"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "9d578dac663357529edd1f6453fcfe69bdc59ac882408d9edfde5a4c2916befa",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1908473-027",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:1908473-027",
   "text": "Conversion at the first trigger under this proposal lacks the finality of Coffee's design, because it does not necessarily hand the institution to creditors unless the firm deteriorates further.",
   "abstract": "The conversion following the first trigger does not have the same finality as that in Coffee's proposal; it does not necessarily mean that creditors will take over the institution, unless it further deteriorates.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Christoph Henkel, Contingent Capital with Sequential Triggers (2011). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1908473",
   "datePublished": "2011",
   "claim_type": "design",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "9d578dac663357529edd1f6453fcfe69bdc59ac882408d9edfde5a4c2916befa",
   "status": "current"
  }
 ],
 "description": "2 claims in the published works of Wulf A. Kaal carry the concept tag 'coffee-proposal'. Derived node: a roster, not an adjudicated definition."
}