{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "DefinedTerm",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/community-audit",
 "identifier": "kaal:entity:community-audit",
 "name": "Community audit",
 "termCode": "community-audit",
 "inDefinedTermSet": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/index.json"
 },
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0757-275X"
 },
 "dateModified": "2026-07-29",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/community-audit.md",
 "sha256": "282034f8150fb0681bd2df35bc7cfa33a4e9980642d1a7c28081206b2152578b",
 "additionalProperty": [
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "status",
   "value": "derived"
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "claim_count",
   "value": 6
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "work_count",
   "value": 5
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "year_span",
   "value": [
    "2018",
    "2024"
   ]
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "non_current_claims",
   "value": 0
  }
 ],
 "subjectOf": [
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3266953-036",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3266953-036",
   "text": "The Persona Protocol redistributes power toward people who have no agency in centralized systems, because community originated audits sit at the core of every Semada DAO whereas existing systems rarely include audits deriving from the community itself.",
   "abstract": "From a social justice perspective, the Semada Persona Protocol takes power and spreads it out much further to people who have no agency in the centralized systems. In the existing systems very few audits exist that derive from the community itself.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Gopinath Sivalingam, Reputation Protocol for the Internet of Trust - Conceptual Whitepaper (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3266953",
   "datePublished": "2018",
   "claim_type": "normative",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "Semada DAO governance"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "781758dea356e55d79c73ad7f1debe7c83de398bd1cd9e0a9a6c2802f276b4c0",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4015908-019",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:4015908-019",
   "text": "Because pre-public token allocations to cover start-up costs run against the majority view on fair launches, preserving the spirit of fair launch requires that such allocations be fully transparent, announced to the community, and open to a community audit of the books.",
   "abstract": "However, in order to maintain the spirit of fair launch, such token allocations before the public launch should be fully transparent and announced to the community with a community audit of the books, as desired.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Fair Token Launch (2022). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4015908",
   "datePublished": "2022",
   "claim_type": "design",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "project allocates tokens before the public launch to cover startup costs"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "e0925afde0c42a16cd5310983789fae3eb3d1f121e2954a72afa64191d00fe37",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4685567-017",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:4685567-017",
   "text": "The impact measurement consulting business follows a distinctly centralized approach, and without the crowd wisdom and community audit that WEB3 Impact 3.0 supplies, such consulting practices are subject to single points of failure.",
   "abstract": "Without crowd wisdom and community audit that are part of WEB3 Impact 3.0, such consulting practices can often be subject to single points of failure.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Impact Investing Innovation - From Impact 1.0 to 3.0 (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4685567",
   "datePublished": "2024",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "centralized consulting model for impact measurement"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "87fb1be89d2661967ed2b0b673fe26448ded3bc3119b122177a4fc13ae5c085c",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4734750-004",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:4734750-004",
   "text": "Bug bounty programs fail at their own premise because the hackers they pay to demonstrate exploitability frequently sell or exploit the bugs they find instead of disclosing them.",
   "abstract": "Alas, hackers often sell the bug or exploit them when they discover them.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Code Review DAO (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4734750",
   "datePublished": "2024",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "community audit and bug bounty programs for smart contracts"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "60eadf91c0913468505afc664c8d8d1e1673d6c5326d031ca7060addb8ab2eda",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4734750-029",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:4734750-029",
   "text": "The community audit should proceed in two stages: an informal vote that reveals collective wisdom to all members, followed by a formal vote in which staked reputation tokens are at risk, and this sequence gives job posters significant quality assurances.",
   "abstract": "Once the entire community knows how each member feels about the code review examined, the CRDAO now votes in a formal vote in which the reputation tokens staked are at risk.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Code Review DAO (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4734750",
   "datePublished": "2024",
   "claim_type": "design",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "60eadf91c0913468505afc664c8d8d1e1673d6c5326d031ca7060addb8ab2eda",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4755632-034",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:4755632-034",
   "text": "A sequenced two-stage vote, an informal community vote that reveals collective wisdom followed by a formal vote in which staked reputation tokens are at risk, gives job posters significant assurance that the reviewed code and the platform report meet the highest available quality standards.",
   "abstract": "the CRDAO now votes in a formal vote in which the reputation tokens30 staked are at risk. This sequence of votes provides job posters with significant assurances that the code examined and the Code Review Platform report on the code adheres to the highest standards of quality",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, AI Learning - Decentralized Governance to Optimize Human Output Datasets for AI Learning (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4755632",
   "datePublished": "2024",
   "claim_type": "design",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "applies to code reviews audited by the CRDAO community"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "972ccebf0c06ac1767a9e443bb95942b7670e806a63c25ee817c368a64c8eca8",
   "status": "current"
  }
 ],
 "description": "6 claims in the published works of Wulf A. Kaal carry the concept tag 'community-audit'. Derived node: a roster, not an adjudicated definition."
}