{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "DefinedTerm",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/compliance-failure",
 "identifier": "kaal:entity:compliance-failure",
 "name": "Compliance failure",
 "termCode": "compliance-failure",
 "inDefinedTermSet": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/index.json"
 },
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0757-275X"
 },
 "dateModified": "2026-07-29",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/compliance-failure.md",
 "sha256": "a2708a54b0e8dff8c2a7a305ed6ab5410874b543ef1dddb0cddc1a740fb6686a",
 "additionalProperty": [
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "status",
   "value": "derived"
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "claim_count",
   "value": 2
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "work_count",
   "value": 1
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "year_span",
   "value": [
    "2014",
    "2014"
   ]
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "non_current_claims",
   "value": 0
  }
 ],
 "subjectOf": [
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/kaal-2014-dynamicregulationviagove-027",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:kaal-2014-dynamicregulationviagove-027",
   "text": "The effectiveness of existing preemptive remedial measures is in question, because the majority of governmental contracts are executed only after those measures have already proved unsuccessful.",
   "abstract": "the majority of governmental contracts are executed after preemptive remedial measures have proved unsuccessful85, calling into question the effectiveness of existing preemptive remedial measures.",
   "citation": "Kaal, Dynamic Regulation via Governmental Contracts (2014)",
   "datePublished": "2014",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "evidenced",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "7320aec036ccf2f6739f0854ea8749903e8902e77c2ec39543b64b358459c408",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/kaal-2014-dynamicregulationviagove-034",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:kaal-2014-dynamicregulationviagove-034",
   "text": "Preemptive remedial measures have a low success rate, as evidenced by the fact that more than 60 percent of deferred and non prosecution agreements executed between 1993 and 2013 refer to preemptive remedial measures that preceded them.",
   "abstract": "The low success rate of preemptive re- medial measures, evidenced by the fact that over 60% of D/NPA executed between 1993 and 2013 refer to preemptive remedial measures103",
   "citation": "Kaal, Dynamic Regulation via Governmental Contracts (2014)",
   "datePublished": "2014",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "evidenced",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "D/NPAs executed between 1993 and 2013"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "7320aec036ccf2f6739f0854ea8749903e8902e77c2ec39543b64b358459c408",
   "status": "current"
  }
 ],
 "description": "2 claims in the published works of Wulf A. Kaal carry the concept tag 'compliance-failure'. Derived node: a roster, not an adjudicated definition."
}