entity · derived
Conflict of laws
Derived node: assembled mechanically from the claims carrying conflict-of-laws. A roster, not an adjudicated definition.
Every claim under this term
- 617681-025 : Conflict of laws problems become more complex and pose a much greater threat to the entire system of regulatory competition once a jurisdiction markets its corporate law as a separate product under Ty
- 617681-026 : The success of Europe's experiment with Type B regulatory competition will turn largely on whether there is a clear understanding of what is corporate law and what is not.
- 617681-028 : To the extent judges are biased toward expansively interpreting the reach of their own Member State's corporate law, corporations may unexpectedly be bound by rules of the state of incorporation on su
- 617681-029 : A single body of arbitrators affiliated through an association is better positioned than the courts of separate Member States to develop a systematic and consistent approach to the conflict of laws pr
- 5554218-004 : National courts and national law cannot be excluded from smart contract disputes, because almost all legal systems grant contracting parties an emergency or exorbitant jurisdiction whenever a party ca
- 5554218-011 : Harmonized standards and innovative dispute resolution mechanisms are only partial answers, because they cannot keep pace with the continuously evolving technical requirements of digital assets and sm
- 5554218-012 : The authors contest the prevailing scholarly proposition that harmonized conflict of laws principles are necessary to govern digital assets across common and civil law jurisdictions, arguing that this
- 5554218-014 : Conflict of laws rules should instead be used as a vehicle for implementing innovative national legal systems that utilize decentralized governance models and respect the autonomy of blockchain.
- 5554218-029 : Neither conflict of laws nor legal harmonization can supply a sustainable, systemic solution, because both approaches result in the fossilization of legal relationships.
- 5554218-035 : Embedding choice-of-law protocols directly within smart contracts gives clarity on the governing law and reduces the risk of conflicting interpretations across jurisdictions.
- 5886342-022 : Where the applicable national property law conflicts directly with the digital ownership provisions of the Codex, the parties undertake by contract not to initiate proceedings to enforce the conflicti