# Construct validity

`kaal:entity:construct-validity`

**Status.** derived

This node is assembled mechanically from the 2 claims that carry the concept tag `construct-validity`. It is a roster of what the corpus says under this term. It is **not** an adjudicated definition: no single statement here has been ruled canonical, and no first-appearance call has been made. Read the claims and judge for yourself.

## Every claim under this term

2 claims across 2 works, 2016 to 2019.

**2016**

- [2811718-013](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2811718-013) [empirical/argued] *(failure mode)* -- The Form ADV analysis is limited because the term due diligence carries multiple possible meanings, so counts of the term cannot by themselves distinguish among those meanings.
  > The data analysis in Figures 1 and 2 is limited by multiple possible meanings of the term due diligence.
  Wulf A. Kaal, Private Fund Investor Due Diligence – Evidence from 1995 to 2015 (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2811718

**2019**

- [3411897-015](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3411897-015) [failure/argued] *(failure mode)* -- Big data is often not the output of instruments designed to generate valid and reliable data suitable for scientific analysis, so foundational data quality problems persist regardless of how much data is collected.
  > Big data is often not the output of instruments designed to generate valid and reliable data suitable for scientific analysis.
  Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralization - Past, Present, and Future (2019). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3411897

## Verify

Every claim above resolves to a record carrying a verbatim source quote, the sha256 of the source PDF, and a preformatted citation. Nothing here asks to be taken on trust.

    curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/construct-validity.md | sha256sum

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of this entity node. Its sha256 is the content hash.