{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "DefinedTerm",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/cryptographic-safeguards",
 "identifier": "kaal:entity:cryptographic-safeguards",
 "name": "Cryptographic safeguards",
 "termCode": "cryptographic-safeguards",
 "inDefinedTermSet": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/index.json"
 },
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0757-275X"
 },
 "dateModified": "2026-07-29",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/cryptographic-safeguards.md",
 "sha256": "4186004593dc775b1d7de97fd63eb499f118387ade20b9c63e2cbb7c6b7b2be9",
 "additionalProperty": [
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "status",
   "value": "derived"
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "claim_count",
   "value": 2
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "work_count",
   "value": 2
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "year_span",
   "value": [
    "2025",
    "2025"
   ]
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "non_current_claims",
   "value": 0
  }
 ],
 "subjectOf": [
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5225296-012",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:5225296-012",
   "text": "Efficiency gains in PoS variants do not inherently compromise resilience, but only on the condition that the underlying cryptographic safeguards are robust.",
   "abstract": "Comparative analyses of PoS variants highlight that such efficiency gains do not inherently compromise resilience, provided cryptographic safeguards are robust, as they are in SPoS",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Cryptographic Foundations and Interdisciplinary Dimensions of the Secure Proof of Stake (SPoS) Conse (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5225296",
   "datePublished": "2025",
   "claim_type": "condition",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "requires robust cryptographic safeguards"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "b2fec675d906334ad67e13b2d97261dc31e38061022867eb3f9ceadd95f4878d",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5245185-010",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:5245185-010",
   "text": "AI self monitoring requires robust cryptographic safeguards and anti collusion algorithms; without them, agents overseeing one another can devolve into self serving behavior and coordinated manipulation.",
   "abstract": "and anti-collusion algorithms—to prevent coordinated manipulation or exploitation of vulnerabilities, ensuring that self-monitoring does not devolve into self-serving behavior.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, How can we Best Monitor AI Agents (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5245185",
   "datePublished": "2025",
   "claim_type": "condition",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "networks of interdependent agents auditing each other"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "4d7adba83ec722480e97bde6528cbe9ce98c709e45cb18794f157a64b8fe7da2",
   "status": "current"
  }
 ],
 "description": "2 claims in the published works of Wulf A. Kaal carry the concept tag 'cryptographic-safeguards'. Derived node: a roster, not an adjudicated definition."
}