entity · derived
Custody
Derived node: assembled mechanically from the claims carrying custody. A roster, not an adjudicated definition.
Every claim under this term
- 2337268-032 : The Dodd-Frank Act tightened custodial practice by requiring safeguards for client assets and verification by independent accountants, a response to concerns over theft and client exposure to Ponzi sc
- 2337268-033 : The custodian requirements work by cutting off the operational mechanics of Ponzi finance: they curtail an adviser's ability to pay existing investors with money invested by new investors, and custodi
- 3411110-006 : The defining legal difference between the Overstock offering and a traditional offering is that the purchaser had to hold the record directly as beneficial owner and could not delegate custody to the
- 3411110-007 : Because direct ownership on a blockchain removes the need for the Depository Trust Corporation to hold the certificate and for a broker to record beneficial ownership, agency costs can be cut and owne
- 3606663-015 : Institutional investors face a distinct barrier beyond volatility: fiduciary responsibility to their clients limits the type of risk they may take on, and the lack of custody solutions recognized by r
- 3936876-001 : Fully compliant legal custody solutions for digital assets increase legal certainty and mainstream investor confidence, and that increased confidence in turn builds markets in digital assets.
- 3936876-003 : Without the ability to rely on proven custody providers, mainstream and legacy institutional investors are restrained from making digital asset investments for legal or business reasons.
- 3936876-004 : The majority of digital asset custody providers and digital asset exchanges require customers to surrender ownership of their digital assets as a precondition for access and trading.
- 3936876-013 : Centralized cryptocurrency exchanges require users to hand over their assets and then act as custodian, issuing what are essentially IOUs for users to trade with on the platform.
- 3936876-014 : Because a wallet provider or exchange that has custody of a digital asset gains full control over transactions, hacking a digital asset exchange is equivalent to robbing a bank: the attacker obtains v
- 3936876-022 : Institutional investors are less likely to engage in digital asset investments where custody solutions for digital assets are underdeveloped, and they find it difficult to commit fully until a reliabl
- 3936876-027 : Operational risk is inherently high in custody services because of the high volume of transactions processed daily, and those risks are magnified in a global custody operation running around the clock
- 4033886-031 : Because digital asset exchanges perform both the traditional broker dealer function and the custody function, they face uncertainties and increased liability that traditional exchanges, which never to
- 4900878-031 : In blockchain transactions the signing function, performed by wallets holding cryptographic keys, is separate from execution, which occurs inside the smart contract, so tokens are never physically hel